Suppose you're a businessman who runs an engineering firm doing custom-made infrastructure projects for big clients, ranging from oil companies to governments. You got a contract for a big installation, and I was one of the subcontractors you retained to do the mainframe that would hold the entire installation together.
I got paid along the way, and
by the time I finished my part of the installation, I had received half the
money, expecting to receive the remaining half after 30 days. But it happened
that before we got there, the mainframe that my employees had erected, proved
inadequate to hold together the full installation, and the whole thing
collapsed.
Instead of running to the airport
and catching an airplane that would take me to a remote country where I could
hide and feel safe, I come to you and demand that you pay me the balance you
owe me. In my defense, I explain that yes, we all knew this thing was going to
collapse before we finished it because the signs were there that it will. But
the collapse still came as a surprise to everyone because we expected the thing
to hold even though we all knew it wasn't going to.
Unable to determine if I am a
swindler trying to chisel you, or a retard that's unable to think at the logic
level of a child, you call the police and ask them to take me to jail or a
mental institution –– whichever one they determine is more suitable for my
condition.
Too flabbergasting to be true,
you say? Well, let me assure you this is the kind of people the security
apparatus of the United States retains and depends on to build the mainframe
around which America's foreign policy and security net are held together. They
are meant to keep the country relevant in world affairs, as well as capable of
defending its so-called democracy against cyberattacks and other attempts.
Perhaps you can see now why America is in such a mess.
You can verify all of that
yourself by reading the article that came under the title: “A Catastrophic
Intelligence Failure in the Yom Kippur War,” and the subtitle: “Refusing to
modify preconceived ideas in the face of hard evidence is a dangerous habit,
for Israelis and also for Americans,” written by Edward N. Luttwak, and
published on October 5, 2020 in Tablet Magazine. Here, in condensed form, is
what Luttwak has blathered about being surprised by what was known will happen:
“A fragment of intelligence
that was just released casts more light on the sudden attack in great force of
the Egyptian army that started on Oct. 6, 1973, and which came as a complete
surprise. Because the sudden attack of the Egyptian army was necessarily
preceded by a very large buildup of forces that could not possibly have evaded
detection––more and more troops, tanks, and guns assembled day by day in full
view of Israeli frontline troops––a huge controversy exploded: How could
Israel's intelligence have failed so abysmally?”
This prompts the question: Why
do the Jews always talk like that? The answer is that they want to project an
image of themselves that is superlatively unblemished. That is, even when their
loss is apparent, they still want to be thought of as always right and never
wrong, always winning and never losing, always the top dog and never the underdog,
and so on, and so on to infinity and beyond it.
And this is what obligates
them to lie. In fact, they tell stories they know can easily be verified as
contrary to the truth but they don't care; they continue to lie. All it takes
is for one of them to find it convenient telling a new lie, and they all take
it up and repeat it a day later, a year later, a decade later, and all the
decades after that, knowing full well it isn't so.
The more ingenious among them
do something that's known in economics as value added. This is when you take a
product that's already in circulation and make it better. But that's the point:
you make the product better by adding value to it. What the Jews do, however,
is add an extension to an existing lie, which devalues the product, not add
value to it. Here is what Luttwak did along this line:
“The report that arrived at
16:45 on Oct. 5, 1973, just over 21 hours before the Egyptian surprise attack
that overran the line of defenders. The message was pure gold: Soviet military
advisers with their families were rushing and scrambling to board aircraft
flying out of Egyptian airfields, very obviously to avoid being caught up in
the fighting that was about to break out”.
This is pure fantasy. The
truth is that the Soviet advisers left Egypt in June of 1972, fully 16 months
(not 21 hours) before the attack that obliterated the Bar Lev Line, causing
America and NATO to rush to Israel's rescue. But Luttwak's fat lie is his
contribution to the Jewish style value added that adds nothing good to their
non-stop propaganda.
You might at times encounter a
piece that claims it was Henry Kissinger who engineered the ouster of the
Russians from Egypt when in reality, Kissinger was involved in Asian affairs at
the time, and did not get involved in the Middle East until the start of the
war.
And that, my friend, is why America is viewed with contempt around the world, and why the Jews are coming close to the well-known dreadful ending of what has been their cycle of misery.