By definition, defying the laws of nature means to engage in artificial undertakings.
And
because what is made artificially does not reproduce or renew itself to last an
indefinite period of time, we accept the reality that what is made artificially
lives for a finite period of time and then exists no more. All that regardless
of what is claimed the Turing machine can do.
To
defy the laws of nature, and try to make something artificial live for an
indefinite period of time, is to engage in a self-defeating exercise.
This
is true in the material world in the sense that every product we make will
cease to function after a period of time. Even something that is meant to sit
there, having no function but to impose itself on the landscape, such as the
pyramids of Egypt, will someday decay and be no more.
This
is also true of the moral world where a human trait that develops naturally can
neither be totally vanquished nor created artificially. If it is there already,
such as having an aversion to eating certain foods, you cannot coerce someone and
have them eat that food. What you can do, however, is prepare the food in
different ways, and get the individual to try the various versions in the hope
that he or she will begin to appreciate some aspect of what they used to dislike.
Food
is not the only thing for which people have a preference. They have a
preference for everything that engages their senses: the sounds they hear, the
odors they smell, the colors and shapes they see, and the feel of what they
touch. And then, there is one more thing for which people may naturally develop
a liking or a dislike. It is the thing for which they will be willing to
sacrifice as much as life itself to defend.
That
would be the belief in an idea that might be religious, political, ideological
or even a trivial thing such as bickering over what makes someone look smarter.
Is it eating the orange before the apple when having dessert? Or is it eating
the apple before the orange? Imagine killing someone to resolve an idiocy of
such low caliber … but it happens.
Most of the cultures have understood that
reality, and people in everyday life make sure to avoid imposing on others what
they do not like. However, the same is not true when it comes to political
organizations whose preoccupation is the governance of the country. This is
where the political parties promote their leaders as if they were deities that
must be worshiped. It happens to those that were elected to govern, and those
that aspire to get elected when the time will come.
As
to the countries said to be authoritarian, the choice of leaders is not made in
a transparent fashion. In addition, to maintain them in power, all sorts of
artificial tricks are used to make it look like they are loved by the masses
even when this is demonstrably false. The troubling part, however, is that the
same kind of tricks are now used in the so-called democratic countries by the
Jews in desperate attempts to make themselves loved.
The
not-so-secret reality is that the Jews aspire to take control of the nation states
where they are allowed to run the political show. Worse, what they do, is only
a small part of their preparation to take control of the world. This is
something they believe was promised to them since antiquity, according to what
they say are ancient scriptures.
You
can see how this lunacy is supposed to progress when you read the article that
came under the title: “We need a presidential commission on antisemitism,”
written by Jackson Richman, and published on July 8, 2021 in The Washington
Examiner.
Now
that the cycle is nearing the point where the American population has had
enough with its leaders kowtowing to the Jews while neglecting to serve the
people that elected them, the rumbling began to reach the ears of the Jewish
leaders, and they are getting scared. But instead of learning from the dozens
of times when throughout history, they opposed the will of the public and got
punished for it severely, they are repeating that same history by calling on
the reviled leaders of America to institute authoritarian measures that will
further infuriate the public. This is what the Jackson Richman article is
shamelessly asking for. Here, in condensed form, is how he put it:
“Antisemitism
is on the rise, and the White House needs a point person to deal with the
issue. Similar officials already hold office in the UK and other European
countries. However, more must be done. We also need a presidential commission
on antisemitism. It would include the domestic antisemitism czar, the
ambassador-at-large for monitoring and combating antisemitism, one law
enforcement official, one academic, and four members from Jewish organizations.
The commission should meet frequently to deal with antisemitism. Its first step
should be to get more governments and organizations to adopt the International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism. That definition
has already been adopted by dozens of countries, including the US. A
presidential commission on antisemitism would be part of the solution”.
No.
A presidential commission or any attempt to make the public love the Jews
artificially by punishing those who cannot bring themselves to love them
naturally, will backfire like it happened throughout history. In the end, all of
that will culminate in a horrible climax for the Jews and for many others.
The time has come for the Jews to accept the reality that America has had enough of their tricks. Self-preservation for them will only come when they accept the reality that they are ordinary mortals like everyone else, and when they will give up on the dream that for some unexplained reason, they were chosen, by no one knows who, to tower supremely over everyone else. They were not.