A controversy has exploded in America about what is fact and what is opinion, and how to treat each once you have determined what it is that you’re dealing with.
It all happened when a new movement began in
America the way that movements always do: A group of people in society got fed
up being treated unjustly, thus organized themselves to demand that their
rights be respected the same as everyone else. That group was the African-Americans
who felt that despite the Civil Rights Act, which compels the governments to
treat them as equals, they continued to be treated shabbily by a society that
could not shake off its racism. However long it took it, the group finally came
to realize why this was the case.
The African Americans understood that the culprit
causing their current plight, was none other than history itself. It is that
America started on the basis of the Whites representing a superior race that’s
entitled to enjoy all the privileges that can be had — whereas they being Blacks, represented the inferior race that was
accorded minimal rights. For several centuries, what was said and done in
America, emanated from that reality, and in turn imbued the still developing
American culture with it.
The African-Americans could, therefore, only
conclude that the solution to the societal racism they suffer in the country—however blatant or subtle it may be—can only come by acknowledging their history,
and by erasing every unsavory vestige that this history left behind. This meant,
among other things, taking down monuments representing slave-owning offenders.
Whereas much of White America has welcomed
this move and was eager to participate in the debate on how to fix race
relations in the country, a small group of Whites, who fear they will be
suppressed if not oppressed because of sins committed by their ancestors, began
to agitate in an effort to stop the movement known as Critical Race Theory
(CRT) which aims to expose the extent to which the culture has assimilation
slavery, and not even realize it.
This being a time in America where nothing is
done without being turned into a political game, CRT was subjected to the worst
kind of political football. In fact, what the fearful group of Whites did, was
pit the Jews against the Blacks by telling them that if CRT triumphs, so will
the denial of the Holocaust. And the Jews rose up in arms. They joined the
debate with the endless repetition of a single argument, something that went
like this: Unlike slavery whose many facets can be debated as opinions, the
Holocaust is a fact which can only be considered a bad thing that does not lend
itself to debate.
But this is absurd on its face because it can
just as well be said that unlike the Holocaust whose many facets can be debated
as opinions, slavery is a fact that can only be considered a bad thing which
does not lend itself to debate. But the Jews are adamant because they have many
truths they want to keep hidden by shutting the debate on the Holocaust.
Perhaps the most damning of these truths, is that evidence was brought to light
to the effect that early in the twentieth century, prominent Jews helped the
rise of Nazism the way they are today helping the rise of Trumpism.
Two articles were published recently that
demonstrate what happens when the Jews deploy the kind of haggling you see in
their publications, thus pollute the marketplace of ideas with useless noise. They
suffocate the possibility of having a debate based on reason, and they advance
principles that the frivolous and the lightweights in government, find
appealing. This is how the helm of the American ship of state is handed to
them. And this is how the ship of state ends up hitting an iceberg. You know what happens next.
One of the articles came under the title:
“How the Neocons outfoxed Colin Powell,” and the subtitle: “Powell became as
inculpated in the Iraq imbroglio as the neocons who had outflanked him to
promote it.” It was written by Jacob Heilbrunn, and published on October 18,
2021 in The National Interest. The other article came under the title: “Reality
as Disciplinarian,” and the subtitle: “Agreeing on what the United States
should not attempt to do in the world is only one part of what is necessary for
America to bounce back in reality, not just in rhetoric.” It was written by
George Beebe, and published on October 22, 2021 also in the National Interest.
Here is what Jacob Heilbrunn has said about
the way that Colin Powell was brought by the neocons to doing what he knew was
wrong:
“The neocons [euphemism for Jews] never
relented. During the 1990s they aligned themselves with the Iraqi exile leader
Ahmed Chalabi and made the case for war with Iraq. When Powell became Secretary
of State in the George W. Bush administration, however, his relationship with
Cheney didn’t fray. It unraveled. Powell, as James Mann shows in his book about
the two men, lacked the cojones to tell Bush he wouldn’t support an
invasion of Iraq. Instead, he became implicated in a conflict that, in his
heart of hearts, he knew was unmerited”.
The point that’s made here, is that when it
comes to pushing America to do the wrong thing, the Jews never relent. Every
time they see a weakness they can exploit, they get in and try their luck. If
their tricks work, they go to the next step. If the tricks fail, the Jews try
again and again till they get what they want—regardless
of what it will cost America and the world.
George Beebe must have been aware of these
realities, the reason why he concluded that discipline in the political life of
the country is what America needs today — and
that’s what his article is about. The following is a condensed version of what
he said about this subject:
“The faith in America’s prowess continued
under George W. Bush in the form of his ‘Freedom Agenda.’ He became an apostle
of spreading the American creed in the Middle East. The Iraq War became an
effort to create a modern democratic polity whose success would kick off a
virtuous domino effect among Iraq’s neighbors. The few voices who dared to
suggest that Washington might be biting off more than it could chew were
dismissed as delusional at best and unpatriotic at worst. The American military
was saddled with missions for which it was ill-suited. America’s clout and
standing in the world plummeted. Our self-confidence was left in tatters”.
That’s what the Jews did to America, believing it will be in the interest of Israel to ruin the superpower if necessary, so that Israel gets inflated into the bigger entity that the Jews alone could never make it.