Half a century of Jewish savagery in Palestine , three new generations of
Palestinians and Europeans, and the people as well as their leaders on that
Continent said enough is enough. They had it up to here making excuses for
every little misfit – mostly from America
– that converts to Judaism and goes to live in occupied Palestine
to feel like a somebody; a feeling they hungered for and never got in America .
They get that feeling in occupied Palestine carrying a gun on their shoulder
and walking among unarmed Palestinian women and children protected by an
Israeli army that is itself armed to the teeth courtesy of the American
taxpayer and a Congress of sick dogs. Converted Jews, misfits all is what they
are – murderers and looters who cry they are misunderstood, to which the
Europeans have finally said: Oh yes, we do understand you well, and we don't
like the spectacle you put on.
And you, my friend, you can read and almost hear the moaning
of another Jew as he tells the Europeans not that the misfits of Israel will do
what is necessary to win the trust of the Europeans, but tell them that Israel
no longer trusts them as if to say that the Europeans are the ones who must
change, and do what is necessary to gain the trust of Israel. And what that
means is that Israel
wants the Europeans to become dogs – sick dogs – like the Congress of America.
In fact, they want the whole world to become like the Congress.
Written by Clemens Wergin, the article you should read is
titled: “Why Israel No Longer Trusts Europe” and published in the New York
Times on March 1, 2014. The author tells at the start what prompted him to
write the article: “The German politician Schulz traveled to Israel to
address the Knesset. He quoted a young Palestinian who asked 'How can it be
that an Israeli is allowed to use 70 liters of water a day but a Palestinian
only 17?'” Does Wergin say that Schulz gave an answer? Did Wergin himself try
to find the answer? No. So then, what is the rest of the article about?
It's about the new spin. Because everything old that was
said to con the Europeans began to be rejected by the younger generation, the
Jewish-Israeli propaganda machine came up with a new spin which the author
tells about for the first time in this article. He says this: “To understand
Europe's Middle East complex, one has to go back to the … 1973 Gulf states ' oil embargo
against the West.” Never mind that this claim contradicts what he is himself
reporting which is this: “Europeans believe Israel is capable of almost
anything in its treatment of Palestinians.”
But to him, the new spin sounds good because it says that
the Arabs coerced Europe more than 40 years
ago, and the Europeans still feel the pressure. What a dumb idea especially
when you consider the fact that throughout the article, he is himself making
the point that the relationship between Europe and Israel keeps getting worse with the
passage of time.
Still, you ask: Will the new spin be enough to sway the new
European public? Apparently not, and he does not seem to believe so himself –
which is probably why he still pulls some of the old stuff. And that old stuff
consists of the three legs of a stool that never stood upright. One leg is to
tell the Europeans there is a peace deal in the making. If they don't do as
told, they will miss out being a part of that deal and part of history. Here is
how he put it to them: “If it [the rancor] remains, the hopes for a European
role in the final peace deal will be dashed.” And later, at the end of the article,
he says this: “if all that Europe has to offer
is disapproval, it will be part of the problem, not the solution.” What
solution is that? The Dissolution of Palestine ?
A second leg is to blame the victims for the troubles that
the occupation is inflicting on them. It is an approach that the Jewish-Israeli
propaganda machine has copied from apartheid South Africa instead of doing the
right thing which is to curb the Jewish thirst for stealing not only land from
the Palestinians but stealing their water also. And this is how Wergin put it:
“The Palestinians are usually seen as victims reacting to Israeli measures, and
not as authors of their own fate.” How can someone be occupied and be happy
about it? How can someone be robbed of their possession and be happy about it?
How can someone be thirsty because someone stole their water and be happy about
it? Wergin does not say.
The third leg of the stool that never stood upright is that
of attacking the Arab nations for the complaints that the Palestinians voice to
the effect that they want a little bit more water to drink, a little less
checkpoints to go through when living their daily lives, and a little less
harassment by the settlers who are, after all, just a bunch of American misfits
that could not get along living among their compatriots in America so they
converted to Judaism and went to live like a “somebody” in occupied Palestine.
In the past, this sort of approach had backfired so badly on
the propaganda machine that used it, Wergin was forced to copy a new approach
pioneered by Tom Friedman of the New York Times. Thus, instead of telling the
Israelis to look inward like everyone else, including the Arabs, he used the
fact that the Arabs came up with a report in which they did a bit of
self-criticism, and he used that as a crutch on which to lien and basically say
the following: Look, the Arabs say they are not perfect. Since the Palestinians
are Arabs, they are not perfect. And if they are not perfect and the Jews are,
it means the conflict between the two is the fault of the Palestinians. And
that's because they refuse to love the occupation and kiss every converted
misfit that comes to settle on their land carrying a gun on their shoulder.
Let me now throw a quiz at you, my friend. What do you think
a Jew will do after making a presentation about which he convinced himself he
did spectacularly well? If you said he ends the presentation with a “gimme
something plea,” you are correct because that's exactly what he does. Here it
is: “Would Europe be ready to offer membership
in NATO and the European Union if the Israelis asked for it?”