If you want to know how far down the cesspool of uselessness
American journalism has sunk, read Jackson Diehl of the Washington Post. He
never fails to show that there is always a way to go lower still – lower than
the lowest, and further down below that. His latest is an article he wrote
under the title: “John Kerry's departure from reality,” published in the
Washington Post on March 30, 2014. In it, Diehl uses the newly invented Jewish
style of painting what looks like a normal picture, to then take the unaware
readers down to the abyss of the cesspool where he surprises them with the
point he was aiming to make from the beginning.
The point is what the Jews have been making for several
generations; one that is based on this principle: “Give us the tools and we'll
do the job.” They want the Americans to keep supplying the Israelis with money
and weapons so that they may kill as many Palestinians as they can, and chase
the survivors, if any, out of Palestine .
It is a policy of genocide that has allowed the Jews to grab more and more of
the Palestinian territories; acts that the Jews intend to continue committing
till they take all of Palestine .
To maintain that devilish policy, and to reach their demonic
goal, the refrain they have been singing all along is the refrain that Jackson
Diehl is himself now singing; it is what you will find at the end of the
article. It goes like this: “a comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace isn't
possible now.” He and those like him have been saying that same thing for half
a century now, and they will be saying it for ever if allowed to have it their
way.
To wrap his ideas in a package that looks like an article he
can publish, Diehl has gathered a number of stories with a common element, and
has woven the whole thing into a narrative. John Kerry turned out to be the
most convenient common element to use in this case because he is someone that
Diehl never tires to beat up on, being the man that keeps rejecting the old
Jewish refrain. Diehl chooses three optimistic portrayals of the region that
Kerry made four months ago, and says that the latter was delusional about them.
He claims he made that assessment of Kerry then, and was proven by time to have
been correct.
The portrayals dealt with (a) the return to normalcy in Egypt , (b) the yearning for stability in Syria and (c)
the possible resolution of the Palestinian issue. Even though Kerry did not
place a time limit for completing his work, and did not say what will indicate
whether he succeeded or failed, Diehl has decided that the time has expired,
and that John Kerry has failed everywhere. He invented fake reasons by which to
describe the failures, and went as far as to accuse John Kerry of enabling the
bad guys in the region who then gave shape to the failures.
Diehl explains himself with these words: “Start with Egypt .” He goes
on to say that the aim in this case was to restore democracy to that country as
promised by its foreign minister; a promise that Kerry endorsed. But this is
not happening says Diehl, and he has proof. Oh yeah! Well, what's the proof, Jackson ? There was a
trial in Egypt ,
he says. You mean the court case that is subject to appeals and reviews? Well,
that's a natural part of the democratic process, isn't it? It may have been
flawed this time but nobody is perfect, and there is reason to believe it will
be corrected. Yes, yes, but that's not the only thing, says Diehl, because a
general appeared on television – get this now – he appeared in uniform to
announce that he would run for president.
In uniform, you say? What wrong with that? You mean you're
objecting to the uniform thing? Well, let me ask you something, Jackson . Do you speak
Arabic? No, you don't? Okay, let me ask you another question. Did you have someone
translate what the general was saying? Did you say no? So, I take it that you
don't know how the general started the speech; am I correct? Did you say I am
correct? Good. Well, let me tell you how the general started the speech because
I speak Arabic and I listened to the thing.
The general started by saying this is the last time he would
be wearing this uniform. He resigned his military job, he is now a civilian and
he is running to be President of Egypt. You know what this means, Jackson
Diehl? It means you have committed the most ignorant mistake that a fake
journalist can make. Being no more than an onlooker, and not knowing what was
being said, you wrote about something you know nothing about. And you went on
to beat up on those who do not see things your way.