You ask yourself: What are they doing writing articles of
this kind and having them published in the Washington Post, no less? Just look
at the title alone of this one article, and feel revolted: “Israel gets no
credit from Obama for a year of moderate settlement construction” as if
President Obama had nothing to do but pet Israel as well as feed it and arm it
when the thing keeps pissing on his rug by direct contact or by a provocative
long distance act. That article was written by two Jews who call themselves
Americans: Elliott Abrams and Uri Sadot, published in the Post on March 13,
2014.
You ask: for what audience does the Washington Post publish
this sort of articles? This is a most pertinent question since it has been established
through surveys conducted professionally, and by some late night comedic
television shows that a good percentage of Americans know very little about
their own system of governance, and know even less about the history of their
country. So why assume that they would care about someone else's system?
Illustration of the above cited facts were repeatedly
carried out by television when a crew would stop individuals in the streets and
ask them, for example, what they have to say about the news that George
Washington who died long ago was ill, and that he was taken to hospital. The
individuals would respond with something to the effect that they heard the
news, and have been praying for Washington who is a good man that deserves to
live and continue doing good things for America .
Try now to imagine what these people would say if you asked
them a question on a topic that is as abstract as democracy. Begin by linking
the freedom they enjoy in their everyday life to the system of democracy under
which they live, and ask them to explain in what way they feel they are freer
in America
than the people who live in other parts of the world under systems that are not
democratic.
Needless to say that these people will be at a complete
loss, especially when you consider the fact that even college students struggle
every day trying to write a good paper on the subject. And this is not to
mention the puffed up idiots who are taken under the wings of some wealthy
sucker bankrolling the think tanks where the idiots sit comfortably and stink
away the absurd echoes which are bounced on them by distant demonic spirits.
These people do the stinking because it is what they can do more than they can
think any kind of thought which is authentic and that is their own.
But America
was not always like that. There was a time when the country had a sense of
being made of people that left behind a world in chaos to be in a place that
guaranteed a peaceful existence where everyone had the right to pursue life,
liberty and happiness anyway they saw fit, bound only by rules of law that
applied equally whether they were starting life with nothing to their name, or
they had been around long enough to have accumulated a great deal, and had
become revered in the community in which they lived as well as beyond it.
The Americans were proud they had regular elections that
only a few other countries had, and this was good enough to define a brand of
democracy from which was derived the freedom that all the people who lived in
the country enjoyed. But things have changed since those days, and the American
people have become aware that their system of voting is flawed in many parts of
the country at a time when new nations around the world began to implement a
voting system of their own for the first time. The American people also know
that where their country used to be the biggest creditor nation in the world,
it is now the biggest debtor nation, borrowing from rivals to feed its poor
whose numbers are so large, they could form a mid-sized nation of their own.
And while President Obama is busy doing all that he can to
improve life for these Americans, you see the two Jewish clowns: Abrams and
Sadot complain he is not showering Israel with enough sweet words. The
occasion was the visit of the rug-pissing Netanyahu to the White House. He did
not personally pee on the rug this time when meeting with the American
President but had an agency in Israel
do it for him by long distance. This is how Abrams and Sadot describe the
event: “Only hours before the meeting, Israel 's Bureau of Statistics
published a report that cited a massive increase in settlement construction
during 2013.”
This is a crime against humanity that America is financing, and has been for several
decades under the excuse that Israel
is practicing a system of democracy. And when you look at how that system
works, you find that those in charge gather misfits – so-called Jews from
anywhere around the world, especially from America – and have them vote on the
most effective way to slaughter the indigenous Palestinians, and rob them of
their lands. This done, they build settlements for Jews on those lands; the
whole operation being financed with American money, and justified by the fact
that the democratic vote was in favor of raping the Palestinians and raping
their motherland. They call this democracy at work when the American people are
so confused about this word, they don't know what it means anymore. And they
certainly don't know what it means to be free on an empty stomach, only to see
someone call on their President to drop everything he is doing and praise a
foreign entity.
What the people in charge of Jewish affairs do next is get
the likes of our two authors to write articles complaining about the American
President (not because the Jews from America
stopped raping Palestine
but) because they claim that the rapists have curtailed their activities. They
complain even as Israel 's
own Bureau of Statistics says that the rapists have increased their activities.
But that's a minor detail, they want you to believe, because it is part of the
Jewish practice of throwing the kind of ambiguous clarity that allows them to
take from you with one hand and use the other hand to direct their pee on your
rug.
And the way to maintain that system ongoing, administration
after administration, is to elevate it to the level of normalcy by weaving the
talk about it with talk about democracy. This is what allows them to establish
a give and take that uses, for example, what the President has said about the
settlement activities, and what they claim is true, which is that “the
president had his facts wrong” even though they correspond with those published
by Israel's Bureau of Statistics. And so, the two authors start playing the
numbers game when what is needed is to take those responsible to the
International Criminal Court, and throw the book at them.
But this is not happening because every time that someone
initiates the process to get there, America uses its weight and
reputation to block the effort. And why is that? Because the game of democracy
in Israel was never about
the rule of law, and the game in America is no longer a process by
which the people rule themselves by electing representatives that govern with
their consent. In fact, the voice they listen to in Israel according to Abrams and
Sadot, is this: “the settler lobby, which has a strong footing in the Likud
party, constantly criticizes Netanyahu for not permitting sufficient
construction.” And the voice they listen to in America is that of the puffed up
idiots who find themselves under the wings of wealthy suckers bankrolling think
tanks such as that to which our two authors belong.