Look at these two titles back to back: “Aipac Is Good for America ” and
“Why Putin Doesn't Respect Us”. Now cross out the word “Putin” and replace it
with the term “the world.” What you end up with is a question and the answer to
it. You can visualize the whole thing running like this: Aipac good for America ? It's
why the world doesn't respect us.
Actually, the assertion “Aipac Is Good for America ” was
written in the form of an article by Shmuel Rosner and published in the New
York Times, on March 4, 2014. And “Why Putin Doesn't Respect Us” is a column
written by Tom Friedman, and published also in the New York Times the next day,
March 5, 2014.
Friedman begins his column by asserting: “Just as we've
turned the coverage of politics into sports, we're doing the same with
geopolitics.” He goes on to write almost a thousand words without once saying
that what he means by “we” is actually “us Jews” who have had almost total
monopoly of the media during at least the last three decades. And what did the
Jews do with that monopoly? They executed the commands given out by Aipac
which, according to Rosner, has been good for America .
Rosner begins his piece by calling Aipac a powerhouse and
admits this is “an emotional time; Aipac was just served a humbling defeat by
the Obama administration, and was forced to retreat...” There is the game that
Friedman is talking about. It is not only played out there on the geopolitical
fields of the world; it is played in America too by an American
Administration that finds itself spending a great deal of energy fighting a
vicious local foe. This is what Rosner is referring to when he says: “critics
voice more vocally than ever in claiming that Aipac's power is detrimental to
American national interests.”
To answer those critics, Rosner tries to paint a picture of
the world as being a wasteland in which Aipac plays the role of a Moses that is
leading America
to the promised land of victory and respect. Speaking of the critics, he says
this: “They fail to see that Aipac is fighting for American global leadership
and engagement with the world.” But then, to make a point that remains obscure,
he writes something that reveals a great deal of what he did not wish to
reveal. He writes this: “Recently, a group of activists and rabbis sent a
letter … claiming that Aipac speaks for Israel 's hard-line government … and
them alone.” This means that Aipac is not taking America
to the promised land of victory and respect; it is taking America to
Friedman's land of defeat and disrespect.
And you can tell why this is happening when you see what
else Aipac is doing. You can see what that is by what Rosner says it is not
doing: “unlike many other lobbies, Aipac isn't devoted to bringing financial
benefits to a specific interest group...” No, doing so would keep the money in America . What
Aipac is doing instead is fleecing America and sending the money to Israel by
the billions – some of which trickles back to America to buy the sick dogs that
run for Congress and help Aipac fight against the American Administration and
the American people.
Here is another revelation that Rosner makes not realizing
what he is doing: “Often it [Aipac] is portrayed by its detractors as 'war
mongering,' but Aipac is guilty of leadership mongering – of wanting America to continue playing a role in shaping
the Middle East and the rest of the world.”
That would be shaping the Middle East and the rest of the world according to
the designs of the hard-line government of Israel , as noted by the group of
activists and rabbis.
Now looking at the picture that is perceived by Tom
Friedman, you see this: “There is much nonsense being written about how Obama
needs to demonstrate his manhood.” Yes, this is the essence of the game that
Aipac is playing. It is playing it together with the thousands of mouthpieces –
Jews and gentiles alike – who keep cheering American officials, encouraging
them to bark at this one, bark hard at that one and bark harder still at that
other one in the distance.
Barks are meant to threaten, of course, and Friedman
acknowledges that practicing this Jewish habit has been harmful to America because
it “laid the groundwork for Putin's rise … [who] exploited the humiliation.”
But what does Friedman recommend instead? Well, he first explains that Reagan
did not defeat the Soviet Empire alone; the Saudis helped by engineering an oil
glut that brought down global oil prices, a situation that bankrupted the
resource dependent Empire.
He gives detail as to how this can be done again. He says America should invest in facilities to liquefy
and export American natural gas thus make Europe dependent on America rather than Russia . He also suggests raising
American gasoline tax, putting in place a carbon tax and a national renewable energy
portfolio standard.
Does he stop here? No. Of course not. Friedman is a Jew, and
you know he will not stop till he shoots himself in the foot. The guy who –
only moments ago – said that frightening people is counterproductive because it
lays the groundwork for them exploiting the humiliation and rising, now says
this: “You want to frighten Putin? Just announce those steps.”