To understand the world we live in and develop alongside it
instead of working at cross-purposes against it, the “West” must now get out of
the swamp that is full of strange mythical creatures, and get into the pond of
clear water to see clearly what is happening out there in the real world
instead of seeing things through the distorted eyes of the Jewish creatures
that have been piloting the West towards the vortex of no return.
The reality is that everywhere in the brave new world that
is shaping out there, people are rejecting the idea of being ruled by a father
figure. This is a set-up that had been accepted since biblical times because
wisdom was the important element people wished to see in the figure that is
ruling over them. But when the world began to change fast enough that change
was felt during the lifetime of a person, the old wisdom started to look
obsolete as it no longer applied to a world that no longer belonged to where
the old wisdom was coming from.
Thus, from Egypt to Russia, people are now lionizing the
younger men and women they consider to be their brothers and sisters, having
rejected the geriatric father figures that kept “dying off” in the old Soviet
Union when President Reagan was trying to negotiate an arms treaty with them,
and having rejected the octogenarian in Egypt that had a hard time hearing the
rising voices of his people.
The phenomenon may be new to a Russia that went from the
Czars to a turbulent time to a young Putin, but it is not new to an Egypt whose
people were happy with a young Nasser as far back as the 1950s only to go
through a turbulent time of its own, and end up with a Mubarak that stayed too
long till he was no longer in tune with them. When they pushed him out and had
the chance to vote, they chose the Brotherhood they thought was going to be
brotherly but turned out to be as authoritarian as the pharaohs. They pushed
them out too and went for what seems like a reincarnation of a young Nasser . His name is Sisi and he may run to be President
of Egypt in which case he will likely be elected.
Time will tell what the future will bring for Egypt but if
you are to judge by what is happening now, it looks like its people have
managed to place the country on the path they chose for it. They just had a
cabinet reshuffle in which 3 out of the 31 ministers are Christians,
representing the ten per cent of the population that is Christian. And for the
first time since the ancient history of that country when women used to rule as
pharaohs, women are back in high positions. In fact, 4 of them have been
appointed as ministers at a time when more women than men are enrolled in
Egyptian universities, and more of them are graduating as teachers, doctors and
engineers.
If the West wants to move away from the vortex of doom and
join the march towards a future that will remain as uncertain as the future
will always be since nobody is a prophet that can read it, the West will have
to break loose from Jews like Tom Friedman of the new York times who, once
again, is frothing at the mouth stories that fit with the image of the ancient
bible but have no relation to the realities of the modern world.
You can see his latest secretion in an article he wrote
under the title: “From the Pyramid to the Square” which he published in the New
York Times on March 2, 2014. The title is actually a quote uttered by Karim
Amer, the producer of a documentary made by young Egyptians about their
revolution. Friedman begins the article with the typical ejaculation of the
Jewish moral syphilis: “Putin reportedly offered Sisi $2 billion in arms – just
what a country like Egypt ,
where half the women can't read, needs.”
The documentary was nominated for an Oscar, and its producer
Karim Amer, as well as its director Jehan Noujaim were interviewed on several
occasions on many outlets. They said a great deal about the philosophy that
prompted the people of Egypt
to have a revolution at this time, and then generalized to paint a picture of a
world that is rejecting the father figures of the old days in favor of the
brotherly figures of the modern days.
So I ask you, my friend, what do you think a Jew like Tom
Friedman would do in the face of this treasure trove? Yes, he would grab all
that revolutionary talk and try to cast it in the shape of an old Jewish wisdom
of which he will say he is the owner. Look how he does that: “And that's why
Putin and Sisi need to see the film. (Disclosure: the filmmakers are friends of
mine, and I have been discussing their project with them for two years.)” He
just said he has been the wise Jewish father figure without whom the film would
never have happened. He does this when, in reality, the filmmakers wouldn't
differentiate the name Friedman from a term like sick practical joker.
Jealous to see the Russian Putin appreciated by the Russian
people, and jealous to see the Egyptian Sisi appreciated by the Egyptian
people, Friedman the Jew ends his now infamous piece with a long rambling
lecture on what is good for Russia and what is Good for Egypt. What is good
will come neither from Putin nor from Sisi, he says, who are offering stability
and a road-map to get their countries back to work.
What is more important, he says, is democracy. By that he
means a Jewish style democracy, the kind you see in the American Congress where
the male and female bimbos genuflect when the Jew comes strutting the
instrument of his moral syphilis. So disgusting, so sickly a spectacle.