Sunday, June 29, 2014

A Franco-European Lesson for North America

People are dying because so-called Jihadists do the things that take the lives of innocent people. And these jihadists are no longer restricted to the types that originate in the Orient; they are born and raised in Western countries where they often pull off their deadly operations; the reason why they are called homegrown. And so the question is asked: Who is responsible for the rise of this phenomenon?

You get a sense of how it all comes about when you read Sylvie Kauffmann's article: “France's Homegrown Jihadists,” published on June 28, 2014 in the New York Times. She describes what is happening in Europe, especially France, but there is a lesson for us here in North America if we can discern the differences that exist between the two continents, and we allow for the variations that come with those differences.

The article answers the question as to who may be responsible for the phenomenon, in two ways. It does it directly by naming some of the culprits, and does it indirectly by neglecting to name the obvious others. Talking about the jihadists, Kauffmann asks: “Who are these young men and women? What drives them?” And she answers by saying they are self-radicalized individuals, some of whom were in prison, and some of whom were brainwashed by video. They come from poor neighborhoods and from middle-class families. They come from good families and from broken ones. They are males disillusioned with life, and females disenchanted with the laws restricting the wearing of the burqa in public places.

And this is where you get a sense as to which of the culprits, the author has neglected to mention. You could say she neglected to mention society, and you would be correct. But this answer does not yield enough detail to help us understand the situation in depth, and certainly not to help us formulate a workable response. In turn, you ask the question: Who or what in society may have contributed to the rise of this phenomenon?

You begin with the wearing of the burqa. Certainly the banning to wear that thing alone would not cause someone to strap explosives around her body and blow herself up in a public place; especially that she was born and raised in the West to a modern family that counseled her it was backward-looking to wear the burqa. But something else; something undetected by the parents was simmering in the belly of this young lady, and grew so intense with time as to make her decide she had no alternative but to make her point in a most dramatic way. What could that thing be?

It was something she could see in the society where she was born and raised but the parents could not see being newcomers to that society. It was the constant hurtling of insidious expressions of hate she saw coming at her from every direction. Imagine what could grow inside a child who is first told she is of an inferior race because the women in the place from where her parents came wear the burqa. And she grows up watching a weekly television show on international affairs with a half minute intro where images from several countries are flashed in succession: there is the modern train in Japan, the scientific lab in Scandinavia, the athletes training in America and yes, there is also that wretched woman wearing the burqa in some Arab/Muslim country.

Week after week after week, she is slapped in the face with this intro and with others similar to it, having been told that the burqa was the symbol of her inferiority. And one day, she decides she has had enough, and further decides she must make her counterpoint in the most explosive way she can. She wears the burqa and the explosive belt and goes out to do just that.

And then, men and women whose parents did not come from that part of the world – seeing the unbearable injustice that their countrymen are inflicting on those who have no means to defend themselves – join the defenseless in their struggle against the tyranny of the cowardly men and women who fight them using an arsenal of hate with which to propagate insidious images of half-truths and outright lies. They are the new breed of jihadists who seek to right the wrong by making everyone, including the innocent, pay for the injustice.

As to North America where most people are conscious of their status as being immigrants in a land that was not theirs in the first place, the European phenomenon did not materialize at the same time. To make up for the difference in the two situations, the cowardly tyrants are adding new weapons to their arsenal of hate. They are pushing the idea that America is an exceptional country modeled after the chosen people of the Jewish faith.

In fact, the Americans are told they are so exceptionally superior, they have the duty to send an army infested with rapists of women and men to go rescue nations from leaders who lead them badly – perhaps as badly as the paralyzed American congress. To go rescue people from the mothers who circumcise their girls – as bad as being massacred in a school or a movie theater. To go teach people the democracy which says Israelis and Palestinians, and destroys your career if you say Palestinians and Israelis. To go teach people how to manage their finances by borrowing like there is no tomorrow. To go teach people how to give everyone at least one gun and have a hundred thousand murdered people a year. To go and show people how to jail two million of their own, and spend more on each prisoner than they would on an entire class of children. To go and show people how to let the Jewish lobby take over the country, and turn it into a laughable joke.

And having your moment of comic relief in the end, you realize it was all worth it.