This discussion is about an editorial that appeared in the
New York Times, and I shall get to it in a moment. But before I do that, allow
me to repeat a warning I heard an old Jewish friend give to cool-headed elders
as well as hot-headed young Jews who thought the world had become their
exclusive oyster.
Long before Tom Friedman had stolen the saying: “The Earth
is flat” from an East Indian businessman and made it his own, my Jewish friend
used to say that because the Earth is a sphere, when you keep going in the same
direction, you get back to the point from which you started the journey. He
explained that throughout time, the Jews have generally moved westward, leaving
a mess behind for which they were pogromed or holocausted, and chased out of
the place. But now that they have reached California ,
going further west will take them to the Orient where they will not be allowed
to pull the tricks they used to pull in West Asia, Europe and the Americas .
Now look at this passage: “China ,
India and Russia welcomed the [Palestinian] unity
government despite Israel 's
efforts to build closer ties with all three.” This is what you find in the New
York Times editorial that came under the title: “Israeli-Palestinian Collision
Course,” published on June 7, 2014. It looks like the prediction made by my
friend some 25 or 30 years ago is beginning to materialize, promising the kind
of outcome which he foresaw then. It is that the Orient will not be fooled by
the Jews in the way that other places were. And this is a good thing because
there will not be a need to stage a pogrom or a holocaust in the places where
they turned their backs on Israel's Netanyahu that went looking for a way to
ply his Jewish tricks.
The part that still needs to play itself out in this age-old
saga is the question as to what the Jewish leaders – both in America and in Israel – will do when they become
convinced they can no longer continue wreaking havoc all over the American
cultural landscape at a time when they have nowhere else to go. Their mentality
has not changed and neither has the mentality of America 's
cultural elite … as it is apparent in this passage: “The Palestinian factions
formed a [unity] government, prompting Israel
to retaliate with plans for hundreds of new housing units in the West Bank and East Jerusalem .”
The passage goes on: “The Palestinians threatened
unspecified countermeasures. It is clearly time for all sides to think hard
about where this is headed.” Well then, what happened here is that the
Palestinian brothers who were estranged for something like 7 years have
reconciled, and the Jews considered this act to be such a bad thing, they
increased their rape of the Palestinian motherland. In turn, the Palestinians
said they will have to do something about that, and the editors of the New York
Times said: Think hard what you're doing – both of you.
Is there a lesson here? Oh yes. In fact, there are plenty of
lessons; not just one. Look at the word “retaliate” which the editors of the
Times have associated with Israel .
And look at the word “threatened” which they have associated with the
Palestinians. “Retaliating” being a legitimate response and “threatening” being
an illegitimate one, the editors of the time have, in effect, said that because
the brothers reconciled, the Jew has the right to rape the mother harder than
before. And because the Palestinians can take their case to court, the Jew has
the right to feel threatened which is why “all sides” must think hard where
this is going.
Is this sort of talk going to change anything as far as the
Palestinians or the rest of the world are concerned? No. Not one iota. How
about America ?
Oh yes, there is still going to be changes there for sometime to come before it
all comes crashing down. In fact, this is how the Jews have wreaked havoc all
over the American cultural landscape for a number of decades. Their aim being
to “educate” the American public, this is how they did it.
Operatives of the Jewish lobby told those vulnerable to
blackmail they must embrace the Jewish message and spread it everywhere. The
televised pastors being the most vulnerable went on the boob tube and told
their flocks that the Jew was their God. They told young Americans it's okay
for the Jew to rape them and rape their mothers. The young accepted the message
that the Jew can do no wrong even when he rapes. The Jew then went on a rampage
wreaking havoc everywhere, and the result is the kind of editorials you see in
the Times.