Friday, June 13, 2014

The Lesson that took me long to learn

In his article: “Eric Cantor's instant burial” published in the Washington Post on June 11, 2014, Dana Milbank talks a great deal about Cantor's Jewishness as if he was trying to establish a link between it and the fact that Cantor was defeated in the primary.

Milbank did not say it openly, and did not even question the possibility in the way that the Daily Kos did when, on that same day, published a piece under the title: “Cantor Defeated by anti-Semitic Vote?” The Daily goes on to expand on the question with the following: “Did Cantor lose because of an anti-Semitic Evangelical Christian backlash against the only Jewish Republican in Congress?”

Well, I am not surprise by any of that because I have a long story to tell in this regard. It is a lesson about life that took 15 or 20 years to sink into my consciousness. It can be summed up like this: Human beings often distort the truth – even to themselves – because they are too cowardly to confront the serious challenges of life. Now, my friend, allow me to tell you what it is that took this long to sink into my consciousness.

It was around the year 1970 that the colleagues I used to work with, and the acquaintances I met through them began to talk to me about the Middle East war that had begun 3 years earlier and was still raging in the Sinai under the name: War of Attrition. These people were sort of blaming me for not “dealing decisively with the Jews.” And despite the fact that the Egyptian forces crossed the Suez Canal in 1973 and began the process of retaking the Sinai from the Israelis that had occupied it, some colleagues and some acquaintances continued to talk to me in the same tone they had adopted before the Egyptian success.

These were all sorts of people I met over the years as I worked for different employers, and spent leisure time in various places. The people were born here or overseas, had roots in Eastern or Western Europe, North or South America, Asia or sub-Saharan Africa. They were Christians, Muslims or of religious affiliations I knew little about. What they had in common, however, was that they all wanted to see the humiliation of the Jews, an opportunity they said the Egyptians had but did not exploit. They pointed out that the army of that country had failed to show decisiveness during the War of Attrition, even after it crossed the Canal.

At first, I dismissed the whole thing to what the Jews habitually call antisemitism. But years of observations – some close and some casual – began to tell a different story. Actually I did not know what the full story was till a critical mass had built up, and the proverbial light bulb lit up in my head. It is that in dealing with their Jewish bosses, these people had imagined the Egyptian army as being the alter ego that will avenge the constant humiliation they were being subjected to, having to suck up to the Jewish bosses in a way they never did with other bosses. And when the alter ego failed to deliver in a decisive way, they hated him as if to transfer into him the loathing they had developed for the self. And just for being there – an Egyptian in flesh and blood – they took their frustrations out on me.

After that, it took me a few more years to realize that the journalists and politicians of this North American Continent were expressing a similar sort of sentiments. The difference, however, was that they sang a tune in public that was different from what I used to hear privately from my colleagues. In addition, I was able to determine that the journalists and politicians – sometimes referred to as the elites of society – were taking other measures as well to protect themselves.

I became conscious of that new reality because I could see that every time the situation heated up on the world stage, and the Jewish leaders were seen to panic, the non-Jewish journalists and politicians who had the upper hand and were in a position to tell the Jews what they must do now to change the dynamics of the situation, did the opposite of that. In fact, they did what amounts to begging the Jews to forgive them for, they had failed to do enough to protect them.

And there was only one way to explain that odd behavior. It is that every time the situation heated up, the elites sensed that the proverbial Final Solution was about to happen, and so they wanted the Jews who will survive it to know that they – who are not Jewish – were on the side of the Jews above the one hundred percent level, as absurd as this may sound.

Also, they wanted the survivors to know that they would have done more to prevent the attempted Final Solution if only there was a way to do it. But there was no way for them to act, and so they repeated the things that they knew the Jews wanted to hear.

I am now convinced that despite all appearances to the effect that the North American elites – which now include members of the Christian Evangelical Movement – are sacrificing everything they have to please the Jews, these people, in reality, want nothing more than to see the Final Solution happen and succeed.

The thing, however, is that they want someone else to take the responsibility for the outcome. Until this happens, they will continue to project into someone else the self-loathing they have developed for the self – being the cowardly liars they know they are.