The Wall Street Journal is one of the most powerful actors
capable of demonstrating in concrete terms why America has become the mess that it
is today. Of course, the Journal – which is American, and having a European
edition as well as an Asian one – can outdo itself when, on the same day, two
editions if not all three, deliver the same message, each delivering it from a
different angle.
This is what happened on June 5, 2014 when the American
edition came up with an editorial under the title “The Bergdahl Fiasco” and the
subtitle: “For Obama, foreign policy is mainly about domestic politics.” And
the European edition came up with an editorial under the title: “U.S. Funding
for Hamas?” and the subtitle: “The State Department winks at the Palestinian
merger with the terror group.”
What you find in these two editorials is evidence to the
effect that the Jewish philosophy of ambiguity, confusion and the quest for
having it both ways, has blanketed America from end to end like a cloud of
nerve gas that has paralyzed what used to be a functioning nation into a beast
of burden carrying water for Israel and for all the Jewish causes in the
country and around the world.
After taking control of the Congress, the Jewish lobby started
implementing its agenda by passing the sort of laws which end up paralyzing the
business of America to make
the resulting hulk function solely upon Jewish command for the benefit of Israel and all
the Jewish causes. You see, for example, in the piece aimed at America how the
editors of the Journal are going about disciplining the Obama Administration
for ignoring to follow the path set for it by the Jewish laws of paralysis.
Here is that passage: “This line was used to explain why the President had ignored
a statute demanding that Congress be consulted 30 days in advance of any
prisoner release from Guatanamo
Bay .”
The idea of having this statute is to give the traitors
inside the Congress enough time to run to their Jewish masters in New York and Tel Aviv
where they usually get instructions on how to handle what the Administration is
planning to do. But knowing that different Presidents have different
temperaments, and wanting to have it both ways, the editors of the Journal
followed their scolding of the Administration with this: “We think the
President has the power to undertake the swap [of prisoners] without telling
Congress.”
Senator Dianne Feinstein who supports the Administration on
everything except when it does something that embarrasses Israel or hurts
another Jewish cause, did it again. The last time she scolded the
Administration is when the Vice President revealed the truth about the Israelis
who clumsily blew the lid off the hacking of the Iranian nuclear computers they
were doing in collaboration with the Americans. This time, she complained:
“There was time to pick up the phone and say 'we want you to know we have
reviewed these negotiations.'” That's all she needed to know to consult with New York and Tel Aviv, and fashion a new way to benefit Israel and the
other Jewish causes.
And so, the Journal ends this editorial by remarking: “the
larger problem is that Mr. Obama treats all of foreign policy as if it's merely
part of his domestic political calculus … Is it too much to ask that the
President act as if more is at stake than his domestic approval rating?” This
is the Journal's bastardization of the way they used to say things. To point
out that Mr. Obama was not giving enough attention to Israel 's needs,
they used to scold him for favoring to serve the American people by
prioritizing his domestic agenda. When this did not work too well for them,
they started saying that the President was after domestic approval rating. They
say this even though he is not running for any office, being in his second and
final term.
As to the piece in the European edition of the Journal
(reprinted in America ,) the
editors remind the Obama Administration that “U.S. law prohibits dispensing money
to any Palestinian entity over which Hamas exercises influence.” That will
remain the Jewish law applicable in America till such time that the Israelis
have a change of heart and decide that doing business with the Arab countries
will net them more than they get from sucking American blood. They will then
drop their opposition to Hamas, an act that will green light America to free
itself from that oppressive Jewish statute.
What a way to govern a superpower!