If being powerless relative to other people makes the male
of the human species feel castrated, the editors of the New York Times would be
a perfect example of that. Like little league eunuchs, they built themselves a
journalistic bordello to compensate for the vanishing symbol of their prowess.
Their latest foray into this murky world has been the editorial they published
on June 24, 2014 under the title: “More Egyptian Injustice” and the subtitle:
“Alarming Convictions of Al Jazeera Journalists in Egypt .”
In the country of America where they snatch people from half
way around the globe and imprison them without trial for ten years or even
indefinitely – nearly 13 years after a terrorist incident they call 9/11, the
eunuchs of the New York Times wave their fictitious erection at a country like
Egypt for trying and convicting people they caught during a revolutionary time
doing what amounts to inciting people to commit acts of violence against
symbols of the government. Mind you, the Egyptians did not send drones to kill
their own citizens in a foreign country; they only gave those they caught a
stiff sentence subject to appeal.
Imagine if on September 11, 2001 – while the twin towers of
the Trade Center were coming down – the 19
hijackers were not alone but had al-Qaeda collaborators dispersed throughout
the country, letting people out of jail and inciting them to set ablaze every
government installation they see. Imagine if some of those doing the inciting
were people wearing the hat of journalists, working for a television network
owned by a Taliban government that repeatedly chided the U.S. for not
implementing the strict religious laws demanded of it. Imagine America being
bombarded 24 hours a day with propaganda material being produced by al-Qaeda
and broadcast on the Taliban network.
Well, Egypt
was going through a situation similar to that, not during an incident that
lasted one day but an incident that lasted 2 years. Another difference is that
the network laboring against the interests of Egypt
was not owned by the Taliban; it was Aljazeera which is owned by the government
of Qatar .
It is the very network that was banned from obtaining a license to broadcast in
America ; the network that
regularly obtains al-Qaeda material which the Bush Administration told the U.S.
broadcasters not to put on the air – precisely because they amount to
incitement.
What's wrong with these two? Well, the New York Times is one
of the oldest publications in the country; one that was so respected, it
wielded enormous powers. As to Fox News, it is one of the newest, but not
necessarily a baby. This is because it was born a giant with lots of money
behind it. But given that the means to gather and purvey information has
proliferated enormously, neither of them has the power to influence events the
way things used to be in the old days. And so, the people who run these outlets
go out of their way to compensate for their powerlessness.
They do it with something like this: “The United States would soon resume most of its
annual $1.3 billion in military aid that was suspended … The United States has
interests in maintaining a relationship with Egypt . But Egypt benefits from ties with America too.”
It is a subtle way to grab the scepter of power from the hand of its legitimate
wielder, and wave it in the face of Egypt .