Read any article or script having to do with the American
military or any military in the world for that matter, and you'll not – except
for one occasion – encounter the notion that an army can be terrorized by someone,
let alone someone that is disarmed or very lightly armed. Now brace yourself
for the turning of your stomach as you read what follows: “The Taliban is still
conducting terrorist operations against our forces.”
To complain that the number one military force in modern
times is being terrorized by a barefooted ragtag band from a primitive society;
one that is armed with weapons barely more effective than the bows and arrows
of ancient times, is to make you sick to the stomach. Yet, this is what you see
these days in articles written by people so imbued with the Jewish culture of
moral syphilism, they are incapable of seeing the damage they inflict on the
image of the American military.
And that is the passage you encounter in Andrew C.
McCarthy's blog of May 5, 2014 which came under the title: “The
Taliban/Bergdahl Swap, Gitmo, and the Revenge of the Lawyer Left'” published in
National Review Online. It is an echo of what the Jewish lobby injected into
the American culture when it brought to it the syphilitic notion that the
American public should sympathize with (even weep for) the Israeli soldiers of
occupation who patrol the Palestinian territories armed to the teeth.
They told the American people with a straight Jewish face
and the sincerity of a Christian Mother Theresa that they should sympathize
with those soldiers, even weep for them because they are, after all, only
kids barely over the age of 18 that must put up with Palestinian mothers so
evil at their core, they throw stones at them for no better reason – get this
now – than to protect their Palestinian babies. Imagine that.
This is when it occurred to the Jews that they should call
the Palestinians a bunch of terrorists. And this is why they came to describe
the Palestinian responses to the military occupation of their motherland as
acts that terrorize the Israeli military. From there, the idea was imported
into America
and grafted into its culture. And this horrendous mutilation of reality caught
fire among those of the Andrew McCarthy mentality who – with a straight “Jewish
face” – now say that the Afghans who fight the invading armies of the Western
coalition terrorize the American soldiers of that coalition ... but not the
other soldiers who are not sissied up by their countrymen.
Now contrast this with the way that things used to be. It
used to be that the world had an image of the American soldier as being a tall
gentleman in uniform who helped everyone and feared no one. Look at him now ...
described by his own people as a sissy little thing who trembles in his boots
at the thought of encountering an enemy that exists as a ragtag army equipped
with little more than bows and arrows. Still, the people who seek to protect
this American “sissy boy soldier” ask that his potential opponents be caught
and placed behind bars in a place called Guantanamo
lest they intercept the fragile little thing on the battlefield, and make him
feel terrorized like the sissies of the Israeli army.
Having that in the background, you may now go over the
McCarthy article, and the first thing you will encounter is the author quoting
the Jewish Michael Mukassey who has argued previously that Obama's release of
five Taliban ragtag fighters is part of an insidious calculation to close the
Guantanamo detention camp despite the fact that: “The Taliban is still
conducting terrorist operations against our forces.”
Now my friend, all you can do is weep for what used to be
the tall American gentleman in uniform, for he has been reduced to a sissy
little thing. It happened not by an enemy he encountered on the battlefield but
a stealthy demon that came equipped with a crooked mouth, a pen and a keyboard.
He infiltrated the American family under false pretenses, and spread his brand
of moral syphilis among its children.