Friday, September 26, 2014

Hysteria makes the Difference between them

Let's accept – for the purpose of this discussion – the notion that there are three nations on this planet wearing the mantle of superpower. They are (1) the United States of America that has been one and remains one, (2) Russia that has been one, and is trying to become one again, and (3) China that is unmistakably a nation on its way to becoming a superpower.

You might say that these three nations have a problem with what has come to be called radical Islam. The difference between the three, as seen by a detached observer, is that only one, the United States of America, is running around like a hysterical psycho, armed with a number of guns and loaded with ammunition, shooting in every direction at ghosts that he sees in his mind's eye.

And while most of the town folks are indifferent to what he is doing as they go about their daily business while trying to doge his bullets, a small mob is cheering him on, even shouting at the rest of the town folks that the ghosts he sees are real, that they will soon materialize and will devour the town, one family after the other. And in the midst of this melee rises one lone voice, a man who knows what he is talking about, telling the town folks not to get hysterical because there is neither a reason nor room for hysteria.

That man is retired Marine Lieutenant general Bernard E. Trainor who wrote an article under the title: “The battle against the Islamic State is not ours to fight or win,” published on September 24, 2014 in the Washington Post. The first paragraph of Trainor's article establishes the reality of the situation in which America finds itself, and hints at the differences between this superpower and the other two.

He says this: “Islamic State zealots received international attention … but the United States should know better than to respond with a clarion call to battle. We have been burned trying to resolve the Rubik's cube of the Middle East. U.S. actions in the region should remain calculating, patient – and detached.” With this, he establishes the fact that he is himself detached from the Middle East as should America be, given that it has no business being there.

And that view is what hints at the difference between America and the other two superpowers; the reality being that the problem of radical Islam came knocking at their doors while America – cheered by a small mob of half-baked right wing intellectuals – went knocking at the doors of the problem. Free from the Jewish fuel which powers the mob in America, Russia and China devote no more attention to their troubles with radical Islam than they do to a small nuisance. By contrast, the problem has become so large for America that Trainor concludes his article with this advice: “After more than a decade of frustration and humiliation, the United States should have learned that the Middle East is no place for Wilsonianism on steroids.”

In reaching that conclusion, the cold eye of the detached observer that Trainor is, makes the following points: “Much of what the Islamic State occupies in Syria and Iraq is useless desert … Its blitzkrieg can be seen as a struggle for ascendency but at the core it is a local matter … The president's attempt to form an international posse makes sense, and the results have been encouraging. But it is a stalemate in the making. Meanwhile the Islamic State could draw U.S. troops into the Syrian maelstrom. The idea of destroying it is nonsense … The situation in Mesopotamia is a violent game of mistrust and self-interest. The double-dealing is almost endless. It doesn't make sense to us, but it does to the players.”

Thus, the American problem is not really America; it is Israel that wants to be a player in the region but cannot without America's muscle and superpower status. It is relying on World Jewry and its agents in America to orchestrate the cheering that is done by the mob of dummies. But after a decade of frustration and humiliation – as observed by Trainor, the man who knows what he is talking about – America should now mind its own business the way that Russia and China mind theirs.

They remain respected in the world not because they flex their muscles to make the world fear them; they remain respected because they don't run around like a hysterical psycho, armed with guns and loaded with ammunition, shooting in every direction at ghosts that do not exist.

They are superpowers on the rise. America is one on the decline, flushed down the tube of Jewish eternal misery.