Just before reading the Dennis
Prager article which came under the title: “Cruz and the Arab Christians” I
glanced at the Huffington Post where they have an article about the Egyptian
military causing unemployment and refugees. After reading no more than two or
three lines, I moved away from that journalistic filth to something else. I
scanned a few articles, and hit upon something that is no less filthy, but I
read it anyway because I judged that something worthwhile can come out of
responding to it.
That was the Prager article which
also came under the subtitle: “The same Muslims who are slaughtering Christians
hate the Jews. Why won't more Christians say so?” It was published on September
16, 2014 in National Review Online. What the Prager article has in common with
the Huffington article is that both use big words to describe something that
isn't.
For example, the article on Egypt mentions a number of young Egyptians who
went to Germany
because they did not want to serve in the military where service is compulsory.
The article used the words “fled Egypt ” and became “refugees.” Hey,
you animals out there who edit America 's
publications; we, here in Canada ,
received plenty of your “draft dodgers” during the Vietnam War. We did not call
them refugees; we said they “came” to Canada
not fled to Canada .
If the animals under Jewish tutelage who write for you cannot get the words
right, you should be there fixing the deficiency, not print filth as it comes
to you.
And let me tell you something
else. The open season on the Egyptian military has started, and it is going to
last a long time because the people who are behind the wave of ejaculating
their moral syphilis into the heads, hearts and minds of your youngsters, are
busy hitting at the Egyptian military because it has been the institution most
responsible for shielding the country when those animals out there tried to
hurt it.
We now look at the Dennis Prager
article. He discusses the Ted Cruz incident, and mentions the article of Ross
Douthat which I already discussed two articles ago under the title: “With
Friends like these they need no Enemies.” I shall therefore not discuss it
again. What caught my attention in the Prager article, however, besides the
usual mutilation of history by a Jew, is the use of the word “slaughter.” Once
in the subtitle and twice in the body of the text, Prager uses the word to
describe what the Muslims are doing to Christians.
The fact remains that since the
middle of the Twentieth Century, more than a million Muslims were killed by
Christian bombs. During that time, no more than a hundred or two hundred
Christians were deliberately killed by Muslims. A few more died during the
course of wars that erupted here and there, but that would be expected where
Christians and Muslims mingle and are subjected to the same fate in places
where hostility does not differentiate between the two.
Cruz also used the word
“exterminate” twice, and he and Prager used the word “hate” at least half a
dozen times in reference to sentiments they say the Muslims harbor towards the
Jews, Israel
and the Christians. Well, the whole world knows that extermination of the Jews
happened in Europe not in the Middle East . And
if there is any attempt to exterminate someone today, it is the Jews who are
trying to exterminate the Palestinians. The whole world knows that too.
As to the word “hate,” every time
they say that someone hates the Jews, they mean to say that the Jews do not
hate. They want you to believe that the Jews love Hitler as much as they love
say, their mothers for example … which is crap, of course. But forget about the
Jews and their relationships with the rest of humanity, these are miserable
people who will remain miserable to the end of time.
Let's talk about Ted Cruz instead.
I bet you that a Palestinian child who saw his parents and siblings blown to
pieces by an Israeli bomb will grow up to hate Jews less than the hatred which
Ted Cruz harbors for Barack Obama of whom he is jealous, and whose job he covets.