Imagine having a daughter, wife or sister that is raped by a
low life, filthy animal they call human being. The police catch the thing, and
before they have the time to deal with him to the full extent of the law, he finds
a lawyer who launches a suit against you, stating that your loved one wasn't
the first woman to be raped, yet she fails to do what the others have done,
which is to adapt to her new circumstances and move on.
The thing that looks like a human does not stop here but
goes on to say the following: Your loved one having made up her mind to refuse
dropping the charges against him, you must be held responsible for practicing
this cynical and self-interested policy ... without explaining what that is or
how it works. Still, in consequence of all that, he wants to be compensated for
the undue anguish he is made to suffer by this turn of the events.
Well, my friend, if you believe that the thing deserves to
be gassed and incinerated, you're not alone. Judging by the manner with which
the world has been responding to this sort of mentality, the indications are
that billions of people would agree with you. In fact, this mentality is the
kind that the Jewish propaganda machine has been spreading around the world for
a time now, and humanity has responded by saying enough is enough. It has
recommended that those responsible should suffer consequences which must be
familiar to them by now.
And you can see how the Jewish propaganda machine has been
spreading its message when you review the article that was written by Andrew
Roberts under the title: “From an Era of Refugee Millions, Only Palestinians
remain” and the subtitle: “The 1940s and '50s saw huge forced moves of
population groups – people who put down roots and started over.” It was
published in the Wall Street Journal on November 22, 2014.
What Roberts does in the article is list the instances that
created refugees during the 1940s and 1950s, stressing that the ensuing
problems were resolved by resettling the refugees – at times far away from
where they used to live. These people moved on with their lives, he says, and
became very successful in their adopted homelands. The idea he is trying to
highlight is that those who might have been responsible for the problem in the
first place were relieved of all responsibilities … which is what he suggests
should happen in the case of the Palestinian refugee problem; the one that was
caused when Israel was created.
But a talk like this has always led people to ask the question:
Why is it that such a solution has not worked with the Palestinians? Aware of
this reality, Roberts has answered the question by giving two reasons. The
first is that the Arab states have practiced a policy of cynicism and
self-interested policy, he says. The second is that the Palestinians hate Israel and the Jews more than they love Palestine .
The thing he has not done is explain how the Arab states
were cynical and self-interested. The reason is that the explanation was given
once before, and the Jewish propaganda machine was clobbered for it. Here is
how that went: The machine put out the notion that the Arab states could have
absorbed the Palestinian refugees but did not because they wanted to embarrass
the Israelis. The reality turned out to be that many Palestinians did settle in
all sorts of countries around the world, including the Arab countries, and
became very successful.
Some Palestinians stayed close to their stolen homeland,
however, and have agitated to keep their cause alive. They dreamed of the
“right to return” and wanted the world, including the Arab states, to help them
realize that dream. They received financial and political help from a
Palestinian Diaspora that learned a great deal from the worldwide Jewish
activities aimed at fulfilling a Jewish dream they labeled “right to return” to
what they said was their ancestral homeland. Yes, it is an irony, and a big one
at that.
In fact, confrontations took place at times between members
of the Palestinian Diaspora and the Arab countries when the Palestinians went
too far agitating for their cause. Such confrontations were muted in the big
Arab countries where the Palestinians were outmatched. But the clash became
cause célèbre when it took place in the smaller countries of Lebanon and Jordan .
No longer able to use the fabrication of an Arab “cynicism
and self-interest,” by which to hold the Arab states responsible for the
failure of the Jews to live up to their own responsibilities, Andrew Roberts
(the unrepentant moral rapist that he is) fell on the old trick of blaming the
Jewish misfortunes on a human species that suffers from a genetic defect called
antisemitism. Thus, he came up with the idea that the Palestinians have not
accepted the rape of their homeland because they hate the Jews and Israel .
And this is the sort of talk that has prompted mankind to
seek an end to the tragedy plaguing the planet for three and a half millenniums
already. People everywhere are demanding to see an end to the plague, and they
have indicated that they want to see the end come once and for all. They are
prepared to see it come no matter how ugly the process may look.
Andrew Roberts closes his article with this thought: “The
lessons of history are rarely enunciated more clearly.” Indeed they are because
the lessons have been in the making for a long time, and the people who fail to
learn from them are the ones that end up paying the price.