I see four kinds of hate: legitimate, convenient, irrational
and dogmatic. (1) If a guy rapes your daughter and kills her, you will hate
him, and this is legitimate. (2) If a media organization – whose policy is to
attack an opposing point of view – hires you, and you adopt that same posture,
the hate you express will be of the convenient kind. (3) If every time you do
not feel well, you attribute your condition to someone that is trying to kill
you, your fear is irrational, and so is the hate you express towards that
someone. (4) If you grow-up or stay long enough in an environment where those
who surround you live by the hate they express toward someone or something, you
will adopt their hatred. You may not know why you hate; you just hate as a
matter of dogma.
An example of what looks like gratuitous hatred towards Egypt
is an article that was written by Christopher Coats under the title: “Sinai
Instability Remains A Hurdle For Egypt's Energy Recovery,” published in the
Forbes online magazine on October 30, 2014. You will wonder at first if this is
convenient hate or dogmatic hate, and so you will watch the magazine,
especially this writer, and discover that the hate they express for Egypt is so
deeply rooted and so unexplainable, it can only be dogmatic. This also tells
you it is something that has been going on for a long time, and very few who
are associated with the magazine today can tell you when or how the engine of
hate was installed in that institution. They hate mindlessly because it is the
thing to do.
To get an idea how else Christopher Coats could have written
that article as well as a number of articles he wrote previously on Egypt, the
reader may wish to consult a piece that was written by Elizabeth MacBride for
the website of CNBC. It came under the title: “While we weren't looking, an
Arab economy took off,” published on October 31, 2014. She elaborates on that
theme by stating: “A year ago, Egypt 's
economy had been crushed by political turmoil … This fall, a far different
picture is emerging as the country makes a surprisingly quick – and in the
West, largely unnoticed – recovery.”
She says that while we weren't looking, Egypt 's economy
was making a recovery. But when you read the old Coats articles, you'll find
that he was looking, and you'll determine that he understood the significance
of what he was seeing. He saw an Egypt that was getting back on its
feet, but because this went against everything he had hoped for, he described
not what he was seeing but what he wished he was seeing.
In fact, even in his latest article, Coats has adopted the
well known trick devised by the Jewish hate machine to distort reality while
appearing to be telling a straightforward story. The trick consists of
reporting on a current event, mix it with negative opinion, dive into history,
scrape the bottom of the barrel, and cram into one paragraph similar events you
picked up from the past. For example, if a train accident happens in Egypt , the Jewish controlled media will report
it not only as a news event but also an opinion to the effect that Egypt has a
decrepit rail system. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant at this point.
What is more relevant is that the on-the-spot editorial
writers will go back decades, fetch the handful of rail accidents that happened
in that country, and list them back to back in a single paragraph for maximum
emotional impact. To someone living in North America where hardly a week goes
by without seeing a rail accident or two which are then reported as news events
free of negative commentary, the treatment of Egypt says a great deal not about
rail travel in Egypt; rather, it tells the story of a Jewish hate machine that is
running a macabre show called modern American journalism.
And in that same sickly spirit, Christopher Coats goes back
in history from where he fetches the bad old incidents that happened to the
Egyptian economy, and crams them into a couple of paragraphs. He then lists the
recent projects that were undertaken – solid steps that herald the good times
ahead. But he quickly ends the article with the following gruesome suggestion;
one that is aimed at the businesses intending to invest in Egypt :
“However, as security continues to be an issue for the entire country, the
presence of foreign firms may be more difficult to ensure.” He remains sick by
hate infestation to the last word.
As to Elizabeth MacBride, she does not hide the fact that a
few problems remain, and in need of being ironed out. But she transits to the
next tranche of her description of Egypt with this: “Though major
challenges remain, investment is flowing into the country again. The IMF
forecasts healthy GDP growth next year.” She goes on to write about the
expansion of the Suez Canal , and then adds
this: “the rebound is coming in sectors including energy, infrastructure and
health care.”
She goes on: “The technology sector is growing too ... a
tech campus and accelerator that houses 85 start-ups [where] News Corp
purchased one, and Samsung just invested in another.” Unlike the way that
Christopher Coats ended his article, Elizabeth MacBride ends her article on a
bright note where she profiles the start-up of a woman named Yasmin El-Mehairy,
creator of SuperMama.
Says MacBride, with a team that is made mostly of women, and
after a year of relative stability, the company whose offices overlook Tahrir Square is
growing again: “Now SuperMama has 1.35 million monthly visitors, a staff of 14,
and is operating on a break-even basis.” El-Mehairy wrote to her investors: “we
survived the hardest time and we're growing. Our team is as dedicated and
enthusiastic as ever.”
These are the daughters of Nefertiti, Hatsheput and
Cleopatra. The chances are good they will build a durable technological temple
for Egypt
– one that will live for thousands of years.