If you want to know how senile the Gray Lady has become, all
you have to do is read the latest of her editorial writers. Their work came
under the title: “In Egypt ,
Business as Usual” and was published in the lady's own rag – the New York Times
– on November 7, 2014.
Look what the editors are saying on her behalf at the start
of their editorial: “It is stunning that the State Department saw fit to help
organize a large investment conference for American business in Cairo .” Now look how they
end the editorial: “American executives taking part in the Cairo
business conference next week should think long and hard about whether
investing in Egypt
is worthwhile.” The clear message is that the people of Egypt – mostly
the young among whom unemployment is high – should be made to suffer, and thus
expiate for the sins of their fathers … and their mothers.
Obviously, the editors of the Times are advocating the
punishment of Egypt
for something that is happening there which they do not like. They mention what
it is in passing: “The Egyptian government promoted Fayza Abul Naga [one of the
mothers] to the post of national security adviser.” Is that it? They are angry
about the promotion of a woman? Well, the truth is; there is more to it than
that.
In fact, there was a long article about that woman published
the day before, written by David Kirkpatrick who is the New York Times reporter
in Egypt. It came under the title: “Egypt
Elevates an Official Hostile to U.S. ,”
and was published on November 6, 2014. There has also been a response to the
Kirkpatrick article on this website earlier today, published under the title: “Egypt 's Superwoman vs. US Congress of Sissies.”
But what is it that they don't like about that woman? Here
is what she said more than three years ago which they don't like: “The United
States and Israel could not directly create and sustain a state of chaos, so
they used direct funding, especially American, as the means to reach those
goals.” Wow, that's a serious accusation. The problem for the gray senile Lady,
however, is that it is all true. But her people are so tone deaf, they don't
realize what it is they brag about when they try to show the world how potent
they are.
In fact, the words of that woman may sound like a prophecy
but they were not. And this is because there is a long history to that effect.
It is that the Jews have used America 's
power and prestige to sabotage all efforts made by the Arabs and the Muslims
since the 1950s, if not before. Egypt
got a taste of that when America
mobilized its “friends” to sabotage the building of the Aswan hydroelectric station. And the Jews are
at it again by getting the likes of the New York Times to urge America 's businesses to “think long and hard
about whether investing in Egypt
is worthwhile.”
Why all that hostility? Because the people of Egypt
have always wanted to rule themselves. Their concept of freedom is self-rule,
and this is done when they choose whom they promote to be their President and
whom they promote to be their national security adviser. They chose Gamal Abdel
Nasser to be their President in the 1050s. They chose Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to
be their President now. And they chose Fayza Abul Naga to be their national
security adviser.
Those choices made the editors of
the New York Times furious. Their mental disorder is such that they have
formulated a concept of freedom around the idea of bribing politicians with
donations, and paying “democracy” workers to go out and foment discord among
the population. This is what they did in America . This is what paralyzed the
country. This is how Israel
has come to run the superpower like a privately owned washroom. And this is
what they want the whole world to become.