It was bound to happen, a Jew in the caliber of Dennis
Prager would someday forget to wear his saintly mask and meet the world with a
naked face that is more horrifying than horror itself. What Prager has done is
tell the world how Jews evaluate what is good and what is evil, and then tell
the parents of children everywhere how to deprive their little ones of a good
education, and fill them instead with depraved ideas of the most Jewish kind.
Prager wrote: “Oxford and the
crisis of the university,” a column that also came under the subtitle: “A
debate on Hamas and Israel
illustrates the moral confusion that reigns on campus.” It was published on
January 20, 2015 in National Review Online. In it, he tells of a debating
moment he had at the Oxford Union, which he describes as “the world's most
prestigious stage for competing ideas” housed at Oxford University
He and his partner went head to head against two opponents in
a debate that sought to resolve the proposition: “Hamas is a greater obstacle
to peace than Israel .”
To his surprise, the proposition was defeated, which means that the Oxford students, who listened to a “fair and square”
debate and then voted, thought that Israel was a greater obstacle to
peace than Hamas.
Look now how Dennis Prager, who is Jewish, chose to present
his case to the readers. He writes: “When first apprised of the topic, I was so
certain that an error had been made that I called both my debating partner and Oxford to confirm it.”
What this means is that he believes, it is a self-evident dogma that Israel
is good and Hamas is bad. Therefore, anyone who does not blindly and on faith
accept this Jewish “truth,” needs to be educated on the principles of Jewish
moral clarity.
And this is no joke, my friend, because the Jews had the
public classroom in North America all to
themselves during which time they “educated” the public as to the kind of
Jewish sensitivities that turned out to be the poison that killed freedom of
speech on the continent, and led to horrors of horrendous dimensions. One of
those was the attempt to set a fake precedent in Canadian jurisprudence that
would have allowed any Jew to point a finger at someone, call him a former Nazi,
and see him or her dragged like a dog to be sent to Israel for further humiliation and
moral torture.
That was the principle you may call: “the word of the Jew is
dogma” which made a Canadian Prime Minister quip: “What were these guys doing
in a war zone anyway” when told that the Israelis had murdered Canadian
peacekeepers stationed in Lebanon
– soldiers that were sent there by the Canadian government. It also happened
that the same government gave a Jew more than eleven million dollars without
contesting the claim because: “we know that's how the courts will rule. So, why
bother going to court?” You see, my friend, a Jewish dogma is something you
obey without question.
This was in keeping with the Jewish view that Israel can
take anything it wants because the Jews know that if there is going to be
negotiations, this is what Israel will get from the Palestinians. So, why wait
till then or even bother to negotiate? Israel can just take and take and
take because nothing can be morally clearer than that.
As to the massive Jewish whorehouse that America has
become; as to the stinking toilet in the Jewish whorehouse that the Congress
has become, the examples flush out that place – day in and day out – like
neutrinos escaping an exploding star. And the stink is suffocating this planet.
This is the Jewish dogma that the rabbis started to inject
into the North American culture half a century ago, having stabbed freedom of
speech in the heart, and monopolized the public square. It is now the disease
which fuels the kind of moral clarity that motivates Dennis Prager to tell
parents: “It could be a big mistake to send your children to college … prepare
them morally and intellectually and, if possible, do not send them to college
right after high school. Let them travel … a trip to Israel would be morally
clarifying and maturing … The sad fact is that if you value moral clarity, the
university is the last place you would want to send your 18-year-old.”