There was a time in America when discrimination was
institutionalized and practiced openly. That is, places where whites only were allowed
were so marked. Also, the professions, institutions of higher learning and
clubs where Jews and other races were not allowed, were so marked.
On the other hand, when open discrimination was outlawed in
America, individuals who did not qualify for something – such as to fill a
position, for example, or to obtain a mortgage – could sue, based on the
allegation they were discriminated against because of their race or religion or
what have you. And no one took advantage of this phenomenon more than the Jews
who sued or threatened to sue anyone that did not welcome them with open arms –
whether or not they individually qualified to receive something.
Discrimination and false allegations are still practiced in America , but
not as frequently or brazenly as before. What also happens now is that the
practice has been infused into America 's
foreign policy, especially in the places where the Jews have managed to secure
for themselves the driver's seat. And because audacious foreign policy requires
a certain amount of popular support, mounting a campaign of local publicity
became an important tool in the hands of the Jews who took liberty to “educate”
the American public as to what's important.
After a period of trial and error during which time the
Jewish propaganda machine experimented with the use of words, approaches and
concepts, it settled on the idea of calling the people who oppose the Jewish or
Israeli policies, “terrorists” or supporters of terrorism. Currently, it also
alleges that the people, who respond to America 's
meddling in their affairs, do so not because they want America to leave them or leave their people
alone, but because they hate America 's
freedom.
Thus, the tools of supremacist behavior that used to be the
norm in America
but were outlawed, have been reintroduced into American life at the foreign
policy level. As well, an army of self-described experts on security are
pushing for the implementation of racial profiling – not because they believe
this will protect the country but because they want to re-institutionalize
brazen discrimination against the Arab and Muslim looking people. The Jewish
propaganda machine has so far been failing in this effort … whose real intent
is again to affect foreign policy in such a way as to advance the causes of
World Jewry and Israel .
Until the nuclear deal between the (P5+1) and Iran was signed
on July 14, 2015, the Jewish propaganda machine was relentlessly injecting into
the debate supremacist hatred against the Iranians by calling them terrorists
or sponsors of terrorism. This was the way that the Jews educated the American
people as to the necessity of denying the Iranian people the knowledge, let
alone the mastery of nuclear science – that which everyone else on the planet
enjoys by right of birth.
When the document pertaining to the nuclear deal was
published on July 14, 2015, and it did not contain even a hint that the
Iranians were considered to be terrorists or sponsors of terrorism, the initial
reaction in America
has been to suppress the supremacist sentiments. Will that be permanent, or
will it prove to be a pause till the Jewish hate machine figures a way to
reintroduce the concept into the ongoing debate? Time will tell.
Meanwhile, two editorials published in the Wall Street
Journal on July 15, 2015 demonstrate how the Jewish machine is coping for now
with the new situation. The first came under the title: “Tehran 's
Nuclear Triumph” and the subtitle: “The deals leaves Tehran on the cusp of a bomb while sanctions
vanish.” As to the second editorial, it came under the title: “What Will the
Arabs Do Now?” and the subtitle: “Iran 's neighbors must decide
whether to get a bomb themselves.”
In the first, the editors of the Journal – who were looking
into the Vienna
document while writing it – talk about the Iranians the way that civilized
people have been talking about them all along. But when it comes to the second
editorial, you can see that the old habit is still trying to rear its ugly
head.
While inciting the Arabs to join the chorus demanding that
the Congress reject the deal, the editors of the Journal present their case in
this manner: (1) “The Arab nations speak out or fret in private while mumbling
or stay silent in public.” and there is this: (2) “The prospect has to be
terrifying for the Sunni Arab neighbors.” And this: (3) “The Sunni Arabs can
expect pressure to shut up and fall in line.”