Jewish Influence warps America's View of itself

You can tell how toxic a parasitic culture has become to its host when you gauge the extent to which the view of the host about itself has been warped. A revealing example of this phenomenon is an article that John Bolton wrote under the title: “Deal-Making in Vienna,” published on July 11, 2015 in the Pittsburgh Tribune.

When it comes to choosing between settling a dispute by war or by negotiation, sane human beings choose negotiation. In fact, no less an authority than Winston Churchill on matters of war and peace, indicated a preference to doing jaw-jaw over making war-war. But the Jews have always been the exception in that they remained faithful to their religion, as it is described in the Old Testament, where blood-blood is the substance that colors every page of that document from cover to cover.

From the first sentence that the Lutheran cum Evangelical-Lutheran John Bolton wrote, you can see the extent of the toxic effect that the Jewish influence has had on him. The sentence reads: “After repeatedly ignoring self-imposed deadlines, Iran and the (P5+1) are about to sign a nuclear deal.” So, while the Jews of Israel never entered into a negotiation with the Palestinians that was not open ended – and never did end, the Jews of America have always demanded that their host sets deadlines when negotiating with other powers. And they held America's feet to the fire, being eager to end the jaw-jaw and start the war-war.

Now, the consequence of reaching an agreement between parties that were estranged for decades is that the door has opened to review a host of matters that need to be ironed out. Foremost among these is the normalization of relations between them, a situation that comes about by fleshing out rules of coexistence based on the principle of live and let live. But this is precisely what shook up the Jewish conditioning to which the Bolton mentality was subjected.

Eager to see the deal collapse at the execution stage, he writes: “To most Americans, reaching an agreement means moving on to performance.” Guessing that this will not happen fast enough to satisfy his Jewish mentors, he laments: “But the Tehran regime has a very different view.” While expanding on this point, he exposes the extent to which the Jewish influence has warped his view of America, his homeland. Here is how it happened: “This so-called 'final' agreement is one more tactic to extract further concessions from Barack Obama.”

He says Barack Obama, but he means the America that is presided over by Barack Obama. What he sees is not an America that is negotiating on equal terms, but a supplicant from whom Iran will extract more concessions. And so, he lists the areas in which the negotiations will continue, and highlights the points on which he fears America will make concessions – points that the Jews have indicated were important to them and to Israel.

The trouble with listing those points is that the move alerted him to the fact they came up during past debates, and were shot down one by one. To make certain his current thesis will not suffer a similar fate; he tries to protect it by attributing another demeaning character to America. He does that by alleging: “one of the many things the White House never understood about Tehran,” and he explains: “This is about negotiation methodology and tactics. We have known that Iran was winning on substance. Now we can see that Iran is also winning on diplomatic tradecraft.” And as always, the culprit is the White House where Obama resides.

That makes his thesis a fragile thing; and the best way to prevent it from crumbling is to leave it alone. He does that, and talks about something that's exotic and remote. He begins with an innocent question: “What is Tehran's objective?” And he responds: “Iran is engaged in a religious struggle with the U.S., Israel and the Sunni Muslim world … The mullahs don't think they are isolated; they think they are right and the rest of us are wrong.” Of course, that last point has always been the mantra of the Jews who believe they were chosen by God to be his favorite children … But that's a discussion for another day.

Bolton now gets back to displaying his eagerness to see the deal collapse at the execution stage. He does that by lamenting: “Iran feels no time pressure to reach a 'final' deal … Time works in favor of the proliferator … Time may be more important than resources, one reason why sanctions have done little to slow Iran's nuclear program.”

He ends the article with the traditional Jewish parting insult. This time he hurls the insult at “no wonder the ayatollahs think we are fools.” That's we, 'Americans,' not just Obama who resides at the White House.