America bankrolls Israel, not Iran

When you see Jewish American pundits (who show by their roster of advocacy to be more Israeli than Napoleon Bonaparte was French) tell America how to treat the rest of the world, you begin to think that Israel bankrolls America and not the other way around.

When you see those Jews tell America to get tough with Iran because that republic mistreats its people, you begin to think that Israel is a model republic where African Jews, Arab Jews and non-Jews of every ethnic background are treated the same as Caucasian Jews from Europe and America.

When you study these matters in depth to ascertain that no one is lying to you, the truth you discover makes you wonder why America continues to bankroll Israel, and why it continues to treat that entity not like the pariah that it is, but the cherished nation it was never meant to be. And you begin to see that the relationship which exists between America and its Jews could not have developed naturally the way that relationships did through history, but developed demonically the way that disasters in the making always have their beginnings.

And so, you study that phenomenon; a decision you take to understand what the Jewish pundits do that dulls the American intellectual landscape. And one of the articles you unearth that promises to help you in that regard came under the title: “Washington is closing its eyes to Iran's persecution of Christians,” written by Benny Avni and published on December 23, 2015 in the New York Post.

To set the scene, Benny Avni the Jew, decrees that “Christmas is a good time to take stock of oppressed Christians around the world.” Because no one is breathing down his neck to question this premise, let alone push back against it, Avni goes on to ask the following question with absolute confidence: “Why not look at a place that Washington tries to warm up to, and therefore overlook?”

Having attracted the attention of the Christian readers by singling out the “oppressed Christians in Iran,” he does the very Jewish thing of using those Christians as a stepping stone from where he proceeds to fulfill what he is passionate about. With the second step, he generalizes the idea of Iran being an oppressor. He does it like this: “Iran's attempt to present itself as a champion of its Christians and other religious and ethnic minorities can lull us...” He now takes the third and last step: “President Rouhani brought along the sole Jewish member of Iran's parliament.” And that's what it's all about. His passion is not Christians but the status of Jews in Iran.

Well, you had set out to understand what the Jewish pundits do to dull the intellectual landscape in America, and you discovered the three-step approach they employ – that which goes like this: (1) talk to your interlocutor about him … Christianity if he is Christian; (2) generalize the discussion by including everyone else; (3) single out and zero in on the Jews. So now, you ask the inevitable question: What's the purpose of all this?

It does not take you long to discover the purpose of that exercise. It is embedded in this statement: “The 8,000 Jews left in Iran may not be molested outright, but they're banned from teaching Hebrew.” That number rings the bell inside your head. It's because the population of Iran is 80 million. It means there is one Jew per 10,000 Iranians. And that explains why there is only one Jewish representative in the Iranian Parliament.

And this is what distresses America's Jews. After all, with a ratio that does not exceed 1.5 percent the general population, the Jews in America control a fifth of the federal senate; and the trend is repeated more or less in that same fashion in the state legislatures. Thus, what they seek to do is use America's power and prestige to duplicate that feat everywhere else in the world, including Iran.

Benny Avni seeks to do that by returning to the subject of Iran's persecution of Christians. He discusses the subject at length to motivate someone in particular: “It'd be nice if Kerry could demand that unless Iran changes its behavior, we won't deliver our end of the deal … Even that's not enough. We should demand changes in the appalling human-rights situation in Iran … Time to turn up the heat and highlight religious persecution in Iran.”

Never mind that this approach never worked for the Jews before. That's because other than Palestine and Israel, America does not bankroll anyone else. Still, the Jews keep coming back to that theme because it is the only tool they have in their toolbox, and because they do not understand the expression: enough is enough.