Monday, December 7, 2015

The Jewish Jihad strikes again

When you have a twenty-one page document that wants you to believe it contains the observations of its author, you believe it. You begin to read the document and find that it deals with ongoing operations in the Sinai. These being events that filled the news lately, they grab your attention. You are happy to be in possession of an eyewitness account of what's happening, but then bump against stories that set off sirens inside your head.

That, in fact, is what happens when you start reading the Washington Post editorial that came under the title: “Egypt's state of repression” published in the Post on December 3, 2015 ... and the editors direct you to read a twenty-one page document titled: “The War in Sinai: A battle against terrorism or cultivating terrorism for the future?” It is said to have been written by an Egyptian researcher who lived in many places around the world except Egypt, but found himself in the Sinai when he needed to … at a time when no one could get there, which is what he laments at the start of his paper. Go figure.

But what is it that this guy is really saying? Well, he reveals the dates at which time he went into the Sinai Peninsula, but does not say how he managed to get in there, or where he stayed when he got there. He also wants you to know that he found himself in the Peninsula every time that there was a confrontation between the local armed groups – which he never calls terrorists – and the Egyptian military. And he says he was there for the duration of each confrontation, no more and no less than that.

Now, here is a word that was not uttered since the 1970s as far as I can tell. The word is 'spiffy.' Do you want to know what spiffy means? It means better than 'groovy.' And if you want to know what groovy means, it is less than spiffy. But enough of that. Groovy or spiffy; that's what describes the stories which this guy is telling in his twenty-one page account of what he says he saw in the Sinai. If you can mask your sadness at the loss of life you'll read about, and if you can let yourself be entertained by those stories, you may call them, the greatest fish stories ever told in our era.

That's because the man says he saw non-terrorist armed groups who were so smart and so efficient, they kicked the crap out of an Egyptian military that could not shoot straight; a military that always gunned down civilians of the women and children variety – never male or female combatants. But do not despair, my friend, because that's when the cavalry arrived and saved the situation as well as the face of those incompetent Egyptians. But who was that cavalry? Do you really want to know? Here is the answer: It was the Israelis. Yeah, the Israelis! They were the ones who came with drones and whatever else the cavalry comes with, and finished off the nasty non-terrorist groups who used to terrorize the Sinai. Neat huh!? Or should I say, spiffy?

There is something else you need to know about this so-called Egyptian researcher. Not only did he refrain from calling the Sinai armed groups terrorists, he did not mention that they consider the Sinai a province of the ISIS Caliphate. But guess what. He talked about it as if it should be; calling the Sinai a territory that is occupied and colonized by the Egyptian military. Honest, that's what he is saying.

What's more, after you've read the Washington Post editorial and you've read the twenty-one page document of that “Egyptian researcher,” you begin to suspect something but you're not quite sure what it is. So you go back and reread the Post editorial, and the mystery unravels. It is that those who wrote that damnable document also wrote that damnable editorial. It is an elaborate Jewish conspiracy through and through.

You see, both works aim to accomplish the same thing. And just by coincidence, that thing happens to match what the ISIS characters want. That is, in the same way that ISIS wants to cut-up the Levant into pieces it can swallow, so does Israel and its supporters in America. But that's only the beginning, because both ISIS and Israel wish to do the same thing in North Africa, beginning with Libya and Egypt. Get it now?

Faithful to their pattern of behavior, the conspirators have resumed their march towards a new adventure now that they are confident the current one is nearing a successful end. They left the task of effectuating the final touches on Iraq and Syria to the capable hands of Richard Haass and John Bolton, and they called on their dogs at the Washington Post to start the drive of pulling the Congress of clowns into the play that's the North African adventure they are beginning to shape.

The aim of that editorial is so very Jewish and so very obvious.