Sunday, December 6, 2015

Two Sides of the Mouth; one Side of the Coin

If you're not convinced that Rupert Murdoch is a miracle man, he is providing you with proof that he is. He did so using both sides of the mouth to argue that the coin has only one side. In the final analysis, whether or not you consider this to be a miracle is up to you. But the one thing to which you must admit, is that for someone like him to be and to thrive, is in itself a miracle.

As executive chairman of News Corp., which owns the Wall Street Journal, Murdoch delivered a speech at the Hudson Institute on November 30, 2015, excerpts of which were published in the Journal the next day. They came under the title: “America the Indispensable” and the subtitle: “Like so many naturalized citizens, I felt that I was an American before I formally became one”.

After mocking “college students, progressive academics and all other deeply sensitive souls” whose prejudices he warned might be challenged by his words … and after paying long homage to Henry Kissinger who introduced him to the guests, Murdoch set out to argue that everything America did – whether they turned out to be good or bad – were actually good things. Needless to say, he also implied that everything good in the world could not have happened were it not for America – even when America opposed it strenuously and lost to those who made the thing happen. That's talking from both sides of the mouth to tell that the coin has only one side.

The puzzling part about the Murdoch dissertation is that he ended it with these thoughts: “We are here … to celebrate America … The world, as we know it, depends upon our great country.” But what exactly does he say America did that is worth celebrating? And what does he say America can still do … upon which the world may depend? Well, this is where his ability to fashion a miracle comes through. Watch him and marvel.

To highlight and amplify the glory of America's pre-Obama past, Murdoch begins by taking a swipe at the current President, Barack Obama. He does that by telling Henry Kissinger who was in the audience, “your insightful volumes have taught us much on leaders and leadership, a quality in short supply today, an age defined by narcissism … Moral relativism is morally wrong.” How is that for poetic flight?

But the truth is that Murdoch has always exhibited a dogma-like absolutism of the most rigid kind – something that Kissinger never was. For him to say now that he learned dogma or absolutism from Kissinger – reputed to be the consummate diplomat – is to misunderstand the man or to insult him in the face. Kissinger was also reputed to be a narcissist. In fact, a revealing cartoon showed him kissing himself in the mirror. Too absorbed with himself to pronounce his name in full, he keeps repeating: Kiss, Kiss, Kiss.

Having mocked college students and progressive academics, the people who will soon be running the country, Murdoch takes up the notion of America being an exceptional nation and accuses those same people of being embarrassed by that fact. He laments that they have no sense of direction because, he says, they suffer from an identity crisis. And this is where he invokes a past whose glory he amplifies. He says that during WW II, America saved Australia from the Japanese. A few years later, it saved South Korea from the North.

So far so good, but the problem is that he now moves into the realm of fantasy ... again using both sides of the mouth to argue that the coin has only one side. To this end, he says that South Korea served as “the buffer that Japan needed to rise and be a great economy.” What was that again, Rupert? Did you check with the Japanese?

He also suggests that America was exceptional when it intervened in Vietnam. He doesn't explain how or why that is, but lashes out at the 'left' which he says was “happy for the incarceration of millions in Vietnam and China.” What? What's the logic here, Rupe?

Guess what he does next. Having given credit to America for the economic success of Japan, he now does the same thing with China. Instead of telling the truth about America having opposed China every step of the way till President Nixon realized it was a futile exercise and worked to reconcile his nation with the “Rising Dragon” of the East – Murdoch says that in the era of Ronald Reagan “the U.S. provided a stable background for the rise of China.” Wow! What this man, the Rupert, can do using both sides of his mouth!

To that, I can only say this: don't tell it to the Chinese who hold two trillion Yankee dollars they can use to punish America for exhibiting insolence and lack of scruples.

Still, to reiterate his views with regard to China's rise, Murdoch attacks the 'left' once more with this: “The Chinese appreciate the efficacy of American influence. The left cannot countenance that remarkable human success.” That amazing one-sided coin!

Finally, the Rupe has one more swipe to throw at the left. He attacks it for not embracing the fracking revolution.

All of that leaves you with one question, my friend: How can the world depend on an America that took in a guy like this and gave him citizenship?