I am going to do something I promised myself I'll never do,
but now realize I must change my mind because much is at stake.
I am going to tell what I wrote more than four decades ago
when there was no internet, and all that I was permitted to do was to send my
missives to a publication that wasn't on the blacklist, and let it circulate my
thoughts among its members and beyond.
The year was the early to the mid-1970s, a time when the
media were whipping up hysteria about President Richard Nixon being the
harbinger of an apocalypse that was sure to hit America if that man remained in
office. The trick the media used to justify what they were doing was to take
frequent polls they said showed the public to be in agreement with them. Well,
I felt it was a cheap shot for the media to cause the hysteria and then justify
it by the fact that the public believed everything they said about Nixon who
may not have been a saint but was not the demon they portrayed either. I became
so angry, I suggested something.
I wrote an open letter to the media telling them they were
on a power trip and were winning. But that was not enough, I said, considering
that they can double their winnings. The way to do it was this: Now that they
have shown they can sway public opinion in one direction, they should reverse
their stand to show that they can sway public opinion in the other direction
too. This will prove they are twice as powerful.
They did not listen to me, of course, but retained the old habit;
one that got worse as they learned to let out a louder and sharper shrill. You
can see how far they have come when you go over an article whose title is:
“Obama misses the mark,” and whose subtitle is: “The president and Hillary make
the case that Obamaworld is a secure place to live.” It was written by David A.
Keene, a former honcho at the NRA, and now opinion editor at The Washington
Times where the article was published.
That argument is not working for him, however, because he
does not say how the public came to fear a foreign threat to the very existence
of America
if not for the media that has been whipping up hysteria to that effect.
Furthermore, he does not say what the chances are that the terrorists will
obtain the dreaded weapon. Or why they would be more dangerous than the
Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans and the Pakistanis who already possess
– not one weapon of mass destruction but – an arsenal of them, and do not
always agree with America 's
foreign policy?
Also, when Keene talks about people “who want to destroy our
country,” he means to say the military obliteration of America, something that
even the Russians could not do with the thousands of nuclear weapons, the
massive missile arsenal, the air force, the surface navy and the submarine
fleet they possess – all of which match those of America or surpass them in
some places. And yet, our author asserts that the American people have come to
“realize” that the terrorists can do what no one else can ... a fantastic
delusion that can only be asserted by a deluded man writing for a deluded
publication.