Thursday, April 14, 2016

A Democracy of Cowards and cowardly Values

No one in his right mind would look at the current scene in America and say that the people are happy with the way that their ship of state is governed.

Also, no one that knows something about the relationship which exists between the art of governance and culture would deny that political deterioration in America was spurred by the prevailing culture.

And no one who is endowed with a logical mind would fail to see that politics and culture in America have reached the point of negatively influencing each other, thus creating a downward spiral that may not yet be a death spiral but is coming close.

The problem with America that is difficult for Americans to see but is glaring to foreigners is that the politico-cultural mix now guiding the ship of state is one of cowardly values practiced by cowards occupying high and low positions across the entire spectrum of American life.

To put it simply, the Jewish haggling consisting of endless talk and no resolution or action, was mistaken for democracy and allowed to replace the European democracy of useful action that used to dominate in America for centuries before the advent of the Jews. The result is that cheap talk has exploded in America at a time when so little is done, the nation has become as paralyzed as the Congress of zombies.

So we ask: What is it that they talk about? And the answer, my friend, is that they practice the most cowardly thing you can ever imagine. It is that characters who would not lift a finger to save a child that's drowning in a swimming pool, just sit there and incite everyone else to go attack a third party. The truth be told … nothing is more Jewish than this attitude; an affliction considered elsewhere to be a disease.

What is horrifying is that attempts are now made to export the disease everywhere else in the world, especially Europe. You can see an example of that in the editorial that came under the title: “Upping the Pressure on Egypt,” a piece that was published on April 14, 2016 in the New York Times.

There is no doubt that Egypt is going through a difficult period where the choices that must be made – often instantaneously – have the potential to turn the country into a Switzerland or a Syria. These are situations where mistakes are made because everybody has responsibilities and nobody is perfect. The country of Egypt is now facing a situation of this sort involving a European young man from Italy.

The result of what has transpired so far is that friction still exists between Italy and Egypt, and the rest of Europe is watching to see how the matter will progress and how it will be resolved. You don't have to go out of your way to get a sense of the maturity with which the Europeans and the Egyptians are handling the situation. It is all there in the New York Times editorial. Here is an example:

“The Western governments that trade with and arm Egypt have continued to pursue business as usual with the argument that regional security and economic interests trump all … France, Britain and Italy have been counting on Egypt to help stop the spread of the Islamic State and deal with the chaos in Libya … Last Friday, Italy recalled its ambassador to Egypt for consultations … the British government finally called for 'a full and transparent investigation'”.

This is how things progress normally in the civilized world. Contrast this with what happens in America when something as horrifying as young Palestinians are shot by Israelis and their internal organs harvested for sale on the underground Judeo-Israeli market for stolen human parts. You get hundreds of print and electronic pundits to blame the victims, calling on their readers to understand that there is good and evil in this world.

The pundits explain that the good are the Jews whereas the evil are the Palestinians. They further explain: No matter how bad the good is, it will always be good. And no matter how good the bad is, it will always be bad.

This being the Jewish paradigm that has flooded the American culture, it is no wonder that the editors of the New York Times utter the cheap incitement: “It is time for Western democracies to reconsider their relationship with Egypt”. And the negative spiral is taken down one more notch.