Suppose you're a good-for-nothing lowlife lawyer, and you're
asked to defend a good-for-nothing lowlife murder rapist of the Jack the Ripper
caliber. What do you do? Well, the first thing you do is select jurors from a
pool of moral prostitutes, and then tamper with them.
Is this another metaphor? You bet it is. But in the eyes of
most people around the globe, this is more the reality of America 's
political life than it is a metaphor. It's not only what the people of the
world see happening in America at this time – which they regard as the
inevitable result of what has been unfolding for half a century – it's
the depraved way in which the American politico-journalistic class has been
responding to the Jewish assaults on the dignity of the American people.
The world is horrified by the sight of legislators and state
governors proposing and passing legislation that obligates the American people
to conduct business not in accordance with what is good for them and the other
stakeholders, but in accordance with what is good for Israel and all
the Jews everywhere. The world is also horrified by the knowledge that having
gone this far, the same good-for-nothing lowlife specimen run around the
country urging other legislators and state governors to do likewise.
As if this were not enough, the world looks with horror at
an American population that is informed, entertained and educated by a media
set-up that is made of two parts. The first is openly, loudly and fanatically
pro-Israel. It is also dogmatically pro-Jewish and rabidly anti-American. As to
the second, it is absolutely muted, totally subdued, and it is quietly
acquiescing.
The world is horrified because it knows something that is
kept from the American people. It is that the Jews have played this satanic
game in every jurisdiction that welcomed them, unaware what diseased culture
was animating the Jews. And when the people of the various jurisdictions
discovered who and what had invaded them, they moved to sever the Jewish part
of their society by pogrom and by holocaust.
The concepts in the above narrative come together in an
article that appeared on April 11, 2016 in the New York Times, and a response
to it has appeared in the same publication on April 15, 2016. The article was
published under the title: “Israel 's
Unsung Protector: Obama,” and was written by Lara Friedman. The response – a
letter to the editor – came from Danny Danon who is Israel 's ambassador and permanent
representative at the UN. The letter was published under the title: “U.S.
Mideast Policy: The Israeli Ambassador's View”.
Lara Friedman has studied the current situation in Washington , and has
posited that “President Obama may lay down his own outline for an
Israeli-Palestinian two-state agreement, in the form of a resolution in the
United Nations Security Council.” And she foresees that Netanyahu will oppose
it. Also, a chorus of American politicians and commentators will suggest that
the move would be unprecedented.
No, says Friedman – contrary to what John McCain had said –
the move will not be unprecedented. It is that McCain's mouth races ahead of
his brain when it comes to Jewish matters, which is how and why he blurted that
the move will contradict ten previous presidents. He so asserted, having given
the matter not a moment's thought … which is how this aging man is operating.
And so Lara Friedman took the trouble to show that he and all those like him
are delusional.
She says that previous presidents allowed numerous resolutions
to pass at the Security Council condemning Israel ,
some of which were even sponsored by America . She counted at least 7
such resolutions under Johnson, at least 15 under Nixon, 2 under Ford, 14 under
Carter, 21 under Reagan, a few more under the first Bush, 3 under Clinton, and
6 under the second Bush … Take that John McCain and come out of your trance if
you can.
Faced with these realities, Danny Danon decided to play the
role of the good-for-nothing lowlife lawyer that's out to defend Israel , the good-for-nothing
lowlife murder rapist. Having selected a jury of depraved legislators and state
governors to impress with the prowess of his intellectual self-massaging, Danon
decided to tamper with them like the moral prostitutes he knows they are. He told
them the following:
First, “America
and Israel
had differences of opinions that were minor in relation to the strong
partnership and close friendship that our two countries enjoy.” This is like
saying, my client may have raped and murdered the little girl, but you should
think of the moments during which she was enjoying his superior sexual
performance.
Second, “The resolutions supported by the United States
were in response to policy disputes … to extrapolate from a selective reading
of history [will] prejudice the peace agreement we hope to reach one day.” This
is like saying, someday they might find a way to resurrect the dead, and the
little girl will live again.
Third, “Obama and his predecessors have insisted that only
negotiations between the two parties can end the conflict … peace will come
when the Palestinians recognize the legitimacy of the Jewish state.” This is
like saying; my client would like to talk with the parents of the little girl.
Love will flourish between them when the parents recognize the legitimate
sexual needs of my client.
Fourth, “We achieved peace with Egypt
and Jordan .
These treaties are a result of direct negotiations … Direct negotiations
between Israelis and Palestinians cannot be replaced by proposals that impose a
solution”.
And this is where the world says to Danny Danon, peace with Egypt happened only because Egypt kicked Israel out of the Sinai. As to Jordan , peace happened when that country gave up
the West Bank on the assumption that Israel will negotiate in good faith
with the Palestinians, and end the occupation.