So far, the only person to have neatly adjusted and
tightened the noose around his neck – and was filmed doing it before hanging –
was Saddam Hussein. It looks like the AIPAC people are eager to copycat him,
and hang their organization as neatly as he did before going down the chute.
What happened was that AIPAC got itself a quartet of federal
legislative zombies to include in the appropriation bill for Israel a provision
that protects the States from lawsuits should they decide to force their people
into a pattern of commerce that will be chosen for them by AIPAC and Israel.
The bill was approved by the appropriations committee and is expected to be
approved by the full Senate.
The States that will come under Jewish pressure to take
advantage of that provision have a model they can follow. It is the executive
order that was inflicted on the people of New York State Israel shall
have to continue paying taxes, and yet be deprived of the services and/or bids
that are due to them by right of citizenship.
In the event that an institution is operating as a
non-profit entity not required to pay taxes, its donors will have to live with
the thought that their government is collecting tax dollars from them while
denying services, benefits or bids to their cherished institutions.
Perhaps those legislators have forgotten that the slogan
“taxation without representation” was a major factor in starting the revolution
that rocked Britain and America two and
a half centuries ago. That's a time when America was composed of colonies,
and the subjects who lived in it were used to the idea of living under
oppression. Still, because human beings – like all organisms on this planet –
are born to live in freedom, the population of the colonies revolted and forced
a change. Imagine what the people of today will do to remain free.
What followed the revolution was an American mindset that
said people have the right to be armed to defend themselves against an
autocratic ruler who would rob them of their freedom. However, no such thing
happened in America after
the revolution because Britain
was defeated, the colonies had declared independence, and the country lived
under democratic rule ever since.
Instead of the old mindset being discarded, however, it was
altered to point an accusatory finger at the federal government, calling it a
potential oppressor. This required that each State raise a militia and be ready
to defend itself. That is, the people thought then, and they continue to think
they may have to fight as a militia against a federal government that will try
to subjugate them by imposing laws they cannot live with. The people fear that
the federal government will use its army to enforce those laws; they are saying
so openly, and they arm themselves to be ready for that fateful day.
This is the reason why the Federal Congress broke with tradition, and
refrained from passing a federal law it would itself be obliged to enforce.
Instead, Washington
is on the verge of passing a law that will allow each State to determine for
itself what it will do, and be responsible for enforcing its decision.
The way that things happen under the existing system is that the
citizens of a State who feel they are denied their civil rights, can go to the
Supreme Court and ask for relief. If, for some reason, this cannot be done –
which happened at times in the past – the citizens can run to the Federal
Congress and ask it to pass new laws. Most of the time the Congress did so, and
the common feature that characterized these laws, was that they always expanded
on the civil rights of all Americans.
This time, however, the forever-cunning Jews have managed to engineer a
situation in which the rules have been turned upside down. They convinced the
Federal Congress of dorks to start a process at the end of which the States
will be allowed to pass laws – not to expand but to claw back the civil rights
of their people, and persecute those who follow their conscience and refuse to
do what will benefit the foreign entity that is Israel .
The question is this: Bearing in mind that the militia are now armed to
the teeth, what will they do in response? Well, they will not fight the Federal
Government just because it allowed their State to do what it wanted. Also, they
will not fight their own State because the federal army will come to its aid.
And so, the militia will decide they have one recourse only: to go after the
Jews. They will attack the Jews, powered by a fire in the belly, a burning
inferno in the heart and a massive firepower in the hands.
The militia may not hang the AIPAC operatives who would have fled the
country by then anyway, but will have plenty of other targets on which to
inflict a great deal of damage. The result may not look or sound like Crystal
Night, but will feel like it and will sound like a shooting gallery.