The editors of the Pittsburgh Tribune are at it again,
returning to the subject of the Iran nuclear deal as if to signal there is more
to say about this topic.
They wrote an editorial under the title: “The Iran deal” and
the subtitle: “A disaster grows,” published on July 21, 2016 in the Tribune.
The only thing new this piece of work is adding to the debate is that it says
something about its authors and those who follow them.
They began to reveal themselves in the first sentence where
they spoke of the “prattle from the Obama administration, which insists ad
nauseam, that the world is safer today...” But the fact is that the Obama
administration, like all administrations, gives out little or nothing till
pestered by the media types who fear they will not put food on their table till
they are given something to write about.
But when the media suckers are given a bone on which to bite
or run away with, they do more than tell their readers what they “scooped” from
an administration that was not smart enough to keep the information from them.
What you see them do is descend on a single bone like a pack of hungry coyotes,
and munch on it interminably so as to make their idle talk about nothing sound
like a find that deserves undivided attention.
But where did they get the idea to tell their readers that
the Obama administration nauseates them? To be honest, I have no idea. So maybe
the editors of the Tribune should write one more editorial on the subject and
explain this mysterious point. Meanwhile, I have something to say about the
subject of nausea. It is not a true story, but one that's based on real life
experiences.
Suppose you live in a quiet residential area of town where
apartment buildings and houses stand side by side. The house next door has a
dog that does not like the headlight of cars. It happens that four or five
times through the night a car may drive by and the dog barks at it. You wake up
but are able to go back to sleep after he does it once or twice. If it happens
again, you stay up all night tossing and turning and feeling nauseated at
neighbors you deem to be sociopaths too obnoxious to deserve living in densely
populated areas.
Well, my friend, this is the closest analogy that can be
created to parody the Jewish editors who shout the first bark on a subject, and
get their echo-repeating dogs going. As to the latter, they keep going in a
never ending cacophony of noises that nauseate the good people as much as the
barking dog that keeps the neighborhood awake all night. Maybe this will help
to clarify the mysterious point that the editors of the Pittsburgh Tribune have
not bothered to explain.
To be fair to them, it must be said that they tried to
explain why they believe that Secretary of State John Kerry is seized by a
cockeyed optimism about the Iran nuclear program when “intelligence sources do
not share [that] optimism.” In fact, they cite three occurrences that amount to
nothing serious. So you want to know what they contend is the problem.
To formulate a theory as to what might have happened, we
first look at the three points they cite. First, they say that Iran is
acquiring nuclear and ballistic technology and equipment. Second, they say that
Iran
is shopping for carbon fiber, which is required to build centrifuges for
uranium enrichment. Third, they say, there is a secret deal that allows them to
enrich uranium sooner than previously revealed.
Looking at those points, you can tell what must have
happened. The first two revelations must have come from what the editors say
are intelligence sources. Fine. But these sources did not say that what Iran
bought violated the nuclear deal, whereas the IAEA said it did not. As to the
third point, it is an assessment that was made by a news agency whose credentials
in such matters remain suspect. But even if true, the point means nothing as
shown in the two previous articles published on this page.
Looking at the tsunami of literary toxic waste that the
Jewish publications have poured during the two years it took to negotiate the
nuclear deal, and the year that passed since it was signed, you wonder what
could possibly be motivating the Jews to show so much ingratitude with such
ferocity toward a country that did more for them than it did for its own
people, and still does. And then your eyes fall on this passage: “Iran's
Revolutionary Guard Corps … threatened Israel with more than 100,000 missiles”.
So that's what it is. Mention Israel , and watch these guys charge like
a bull that’s shown a red towel. The trouble is that time after time, thousands
of Jews and their barking dogs threaten Iran
with “all American options are on the table,” and when Iran responds
once in a while, the Jews go apoplectic and start bashing the American
administration for not exercising the option on the table.