Speaking of the nuclear deal with Iran , otherwise known as the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), look what Michael Makovsky is
recommending in his latest article:
“Begin undoing the JCPOA. Expand U.S. ballistic-missile defenses
throughout the region, and threaten to shoot down any Iranian-launched
missiles, even if only test-fired. Halt Iran 's
ballistic missile program and establish U.S. credibility. Pressure the IAEA
even threaten to cut off its funding. Move beyond Obama's belief that Iran should
'share the neighborhood.' Instead, challenge and oppose Iran and
constrain its capabilities. Adhere to the JCPOA only as long as it serves our
interests. Commit that Iran
will not develop its ballistic missile and advanced nuclear R&D programs.
Confront Iran
and ensure that its nuclear program is ended. It could get very messy and very
dangerous”.
That's a condensed version of the last three paragraphs in
the article that Makovsky wrote under the title: “What's the Deal with Iran ?” and the
subtitle: “A bad year for a bad agreement.” It was published on July 9, 2016 in
the Weekly Standard. Whatever the logic that the writer employs to arrive at
those conclusions, it must be said that he is an important opinion maker in the
hierarchy of Jewish thinkers. He is, in effect, a player whose views influence
the decisions taken both in Washington and Tel Aviv.
It follows that if the danger predicted by the writer
materializes, the world will blame its aftermath – however benign or
catastrophic it may be – on none other than the Jews. And there is only one way
that the world has preferred to deal with these people: It holocausted them in
one painful fashion or another. Therefore, we cannot escape the conclusion that
Michael Makovsky – who is intelligent enough to know all that – is consciously
begging for a holocaust that may, in effect, turn out to be the last such
undertaking because this time, the Final Solution will certainly be the goal …
and no one will oppose it.
To get to his conclusion and pronounce his judgment,
Makovsky has jammed into the article the Jewish talking points that were used
and abused over the years in the lead-up to the signing of the nuclear
agreement, and has added a number of new points. He describes two of the latter
as follows: First, “An even more important result of the JCPOA is the effective
legalization of Iran 's
ballistic missile program.” Second, “Another key dynamic of the JCPOA is Tehran 's redoubled
radicalism”.
First, he advises that the U.S.
objective should be to ensure that Iran will not be able to launch
nuclear weapons. And he bemoans that Iran is legally testing missiles
that could someday do just that. The suggestion he is making is that because
every scientific and technological progress can ultimately be weaponized, Iran must be
forbidden from making any such progress. But if it does, America must
sprint into action and bomb the facilities out of existence, says Michael
Makovsky the Jew.
Well, guess what. This is the attitude that the Jews have
always adopted with regard to the Arab and Muslim nations. Without revealing
their motives, the Jews first convinced the European colonial powers to join Israel and
impede Arab and Muslim progress by every military and economic means at their
disposal. The Jews then convinced the Americans to do likewise, and the
Americans did.
The result has been that the Middle
East developed into a source of so much worries, it caused those
powers to look into the matter seriously. When they discovered that the Jews
had taken them for a self-serving satanic ride, the Europeans and the Americans
began to rethink their policies. In the end, they wisely chose to reverse their
destructive decisions.
Second, Makovsky does what he does best which is to slander
the enemy that the Jews have chosen for the day. This being Hassan Rouhani of Iran , Makovsky
says that contrary to popular belief, he is not a moderate but a hardliner like
all the others. Why is that? Because the man said that the JCPOA has achieved Iran 's goals and interests, including the
possible liberation of Palestine .
To the Arab and Muslim worlds, that pronouncement means to
bring about a majority rule in Palestine .
To the Jewish leaders inside and outside of Israel , it means to end the apartheid
system that has served them so well. Hence, Makovsky's hatred for Rouhani, and
his badmouthing of the man for doing nothing worse than being civilized.
You can be certain that there will be a handful of
legislative zombies in Washington
who will be mesmerized by what Makovsky is saying, and will work to undo the
JCPOA. They will try to convince their colleagues in the House and the Senate
it is a good idea to shoot down Iran 's
test-fired missiles, thus halt the program. And they will work to deny Iran a place in
the neighborhood that the Jews wish to dominate. For this to happen, they will
want to challenge Iran
and constrain its capabilities by opposing its progress.