When a feud goes on for decades between individuals,
families, tribes or nations, and the antagonists decide to end it, they sit
together, go over their differences one item at a time and resolve them so that
they can be put behind them, and the former antagonists move on with their
lives.
This is what happened between the United
States of America and Iran , having battled it for several
decades over big things and small ones. They sat together in the company of
other nations representing the rest of humanity, and they managed to resolve
many of the serious issues. To make sure that superfluous issues did not get in
the way of the negotiations, they agreed to disagree on them, and they set them
aside for the passage of time to heal the wounds before they will be tackled
again in the future.
That's how this sort of events was handled for ages, and
that's why humanity has progressed with the passage of time despite the
difficulties it encountered along the way. It is that in the midst of this
advancement, there lingered the Jewish question ... a calamity imposed on the
human race by recruits to an ideology whose destructive power has slowed
humanity's progress but never managed to halt it completely.
Now that the deal between Iran and the world has been
signed, sealed and delivered; and now that the outstanding issues are being
cleared up pursuant to the clauses of the agreement, the Jews are trying to get
into the act the same way they always did since coming into existence. They
recruited people of all sorts, and taught them how to bark the right sort of
refrain when the signal is given to do so.
Barking is what Fred Fleitz is doing in the article he wrote
under the title: “Secret Ransom Payment Is More Evidence of the Enormous Fraud
of the Iran Deal,” published on August 3, 2016 in National Review Online. Under
the guise of exercising his right to free speech, he is participating in the
Jewish haggling that used to stand in the way of resolving the issues … and
used now in an attempt to derail the agreement with Iran .
Similar games were played by the Jewish leaders throughout
the ages, and this is why ordinary Jews paid a heavy price each and every time.
Despite the fact it is universally acknowledged that the anti-Jewish pogroms
and holocausts came about in response to what the leaders were orchestrating,
today's Jewish leaders are emulating the performance of their predecessors …
and yet, no uproar is emanating from any quarter telling them to stop because
humanity has had it up to here with them.
Thus, knowing that he will get away with anything he says –
protected by the apathy enveloping all Jewish matters – Fred Fleitz writes the
following: “This is not the first time Obama has paid a ransom to the mullahs …
Obama officials have denied that the $400 million was a ransom payment.
Instead, they say it was the first installment of an American payment to
resolve a dispute over a pre-1979 arms deal with the Shah's government”.
In fact, what the Obama officials did is typical of what
normal human beings have been doing through the ages, and why humanity has
progressed as it did. But to cast doubt on the event – charging that the return
of Iran's money to Iran was ransom paid in return for a dubious quid pro quo –
is the kind of Jewish haggling that tends to escalate till it ends violently
one way or the other, sooner or later.
And here is where the escalation might start: “Why the
secrecy? Why did Obama fail to disclose this shipment? I am concerned that the
negotiations to free the U.S.
prisoners and the ransom payment were structured by the Administration so that
it could avoid briefing Congress before it voted on the Iran deal”.
The fact is that there was no secrecy for the simple reason
that there was no need for one. America
had the right to get back its prisoners, and Iran had the right to get back its
money. To say that one or the other paid ransom in this exchange is to be
feeble minded if not an outright mental case.
What Fred Fleitz has done is pluck a piece of fiction out of
thin air. He turned it into an accusation whose intent was to put the
Administration on the defensive, thus force it to respond to something that has
no substance. The expectation was that new occasions will be created for
plucking more fictions with which to keep the haggling going, and keep the
wounds on both sides festering forever.
And in the same way that the Jews have managed to freeze the
situation in Palestine – thus maintain the
occupation for an indefinite period of time – Fleitz and those like him are trying
to freeze any rapprochement that might be achieved between America and Iran .