A new controversy has exploded in America
with the news that the swap between American prisoners held in Iran and Iranian money held in America , did
not happen exactly simultaneously.
The expectation now is that the revelation will be haggled
over throughout the nation over several days. And if the Congress decides to
hold hearings on the matter – as called for by some people – the controversy
will persist for several more months if not years.
That's not how America used to operate before the
Jews infiltrated it so deeply, they replaced its tradition of free speech with
the Jewish haggle, and replaced its democratic system of governance with a
paralyzing slug-fest consisting of everyone watching, accusing and investigating
everyone else. So the question to ask: What exactly have the Jews done to pull America to such
depth?
To get an idea, we can put things in simple enough human
terms for everyone to understand. Creating an allegory would be ideal; so here
is one:
Some parents are harsh and some are not because some spare
the rod and some don't. Whether you are intelligent or you're not, you're bound
to be on one side of this divide or the other. That's because parenting is more
a human instinct than a product of classroom study.
You look around and see two sets of parents, one that's
simple yet disciplined and treating the children harshly at times; another set
that's jovial and permissive on the surface but contradictory and paradoxical
at times. You talk to the neighbors and receive confusing information that leaves
you neither here nor there, so you rely on your instinct to decide which set of
parents is the better one.
At first you side with the jovial and permissive family, but
then start being bothered by its contradictions and paradoxes, so you decide to
do something to find out what's going on. Knowing that the family adopts
children who are not its own, you arrange to have a gifted child adopted by it
to see what's inside the household and report to you. To your horror, you learn
that the household is an indoor camp where the children exist solely for the
sexual gratification of the adults.
You deem this household to be the place where pure evil
resides. And you begin to understand why the evil was so difficult to detect.
It's an evil that is confusing because it speaks with a mouth that's endowed
with four sides from which to articulate several contradictory ideas at the
same time.
The point of this story is that some nations operate on the
basis of 'what you see is what you get.' Other nations operate in one fashion
yet appear to operate in another. The first do not care what you call their
system of governance. The second insist on being called liberal-democratic. But
like the evil household, they put out faint signals of contradictions and
paradoxes that should warn everything is not kosher in that place. However,
most of us ignore such signals because we do not understand them, we fear
confronting evil, or we too benefit from the situation.
To see how that works, we can look at four articles that
appeared at the same time around August 16, 2016. They represent the four-sided
mouth of Judaism; the most destructive evil ever inflicted on humanity.
One article came under the title: “Tracking freedom's enemies”
and the subtitle: “A new State Department report confirms most people are
denied basic human rights.” It was written by Clifford D. May and published in
The Washington Times. A second article came under the title: “The Lutheran
Church Attacks Israel Again,” written by Elliott Abrams and published on the
website of the Council on Foreign Relations. A third came under the title: “Why
do people Still Donate to Universities?” It was written by Dennis Prager and
published in National Review Online. A fourth came under the title: “Putin is
gobbling up whatever he can – while Obama does nothing,” written by Benny Avni
and published in the New York Post.
These are four Jews from among the dozens who keep telling America that
despite the fact they have turned everything they touched into trash for nearly
4000 years, they still own the design for the creation of a perfect world. The
way that Clifford May chose to say so, is to trash everyone except Israel and
those who pretend to tolerate it. He ends the article with this question: “Are
those in the West willing to do more than we did? If I were to ask that, what
would you answer?
My answer is this: clip Israel 's wings. This will send a
strong signal to the Jews the world over that they must never again counsel someone
how to do anything … especially the mentally retarded such as those populating
the American Congress.
As to Elliott Abrams, he starts the article by attacking the
Lutheran Church Israel .”
Until when? Until “Israel complies with internationally recognized human rights
standards as specified in existing U.S. laws, and end its occupation of
Palestine”.
What's wrong with that in the eyes of Abrams? Well, it's the
thing which the Jews call singling out Israel . Here is how Abrams
formulated that complaint: “And of course, these requirements apply to one single
country: Israel .”
Apparently this guy does not realize that only Israel
is occupying Palestine
As to Dennis Prager, he wants people to stop donating
to the universities of America Prager University
As to Benny Avni, he uses 700 of the 770-words article
to whine about “Putin gobbling up whatever he can.” And he uses the last 70
words to do some whining of his own – like this: “Putin's known as a great
poker player who holds the weakest hand. But we facilitate his activist style
by constantly whining about our own hand, and by waiting to be dealt a pair of
aces. No wonder Putin now sits in front of a much larger stack of chips than
when he began this expansion by invading Georgia
with barely a peep from Bush-era America