Beside the nickname chicken-shit, Benjamin
Netanyahu of Israel
has also earned the appellation rug-pissing-dog. That's because he goes
everywhere in the world and behaves like a house-trained dog except in the English
speaking necks of the wood where he takes liberty relieving himself on the rugs
where he is allowed to trot, and where the owners continue to treat him like a
member of the human species … regardless.
He came to Canada and chided the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) for being only 100 percent biased in favour of
the Jewish and Israeli causes. He went to Britain and did the same thing with
regard to the BBC. And I hear he also did it in Australia . But the most celebrated
event is the stir he caused when discharging his verbal bladder on the rug of
some White House situated in the American District of Columbia.
In any case, controlling or dominating the
rags of the world has always been his most burning desire. He covets them all,
be they supermarket or civic tabloids, or be they broadsheets delivered in
print form or broadcast electronically via the ether or cyberspace.
Of course, Netanyahu could not have done
any of this had it not been for the work that the rabbis and their disciples
did to brainwash the house owners receiving him. Some view an Israeli leak on
their rug the way that the wildebeests of the Serengeti desert view rain. To
see that, you only need to view the record of the Israeli guests that the electronic
tabloid named Fox News was inviting in 2012 to go on the air and warn the
incumbent President of the United States running for re-election that he better
comply with the demands of the pissing dog or the hordes of Jewish voters will
haul him to the helicopter of regret and kick him out of the District.
But the world is now spinning at such a
fast rate, old paradigms are falling by the wayside, and new ones are forming
to take their place. This shift being at an early stage, it is difficult to
tell how far it will go and how much it will change what's on the ground. What
we can tell at this point, however, is that attempts are mounted to control the
old dog's bladder problem.
A proof of that is an article that has
appeared under the title: “How Benjamin Netanyahu Is Crushing Israel 's Free
Press,” written by Ruth Margalit and published on July 30, 2016 in the
cyberspace rag calling itself New York Times. The discussion is based on a
report that was issued by an outfit they call Freedom House, a group whose
knowledge about freedom is as genuine as Netanyahu's knowledge about good
manners. It is nevertheless heartening to see a dogfight between two dogs of
equal disrepute, an indication that they will, for a while at least, be
restrained from committing mischief against the good people of the earth.
While the article is about Netanyahu's
machinations in Israel –
most likely done in broken Hebrew and in Yiddish since only the Arabs can speak
perfect Hebrew – it is easy to project what's happening there, into places like
America
where the Sheldon Adelsons of this world pull the same sort of intrigues. They
even pull them ten times more severely and get away with it because political
correctness and the threat of being labelled anti-Semitic inhibit anyone from
criticising these characters no matter what they do or how outrageous they are.
Thus, whereas “Freedom House focused on the
outsize influence of Israel Hayom, owned by the American Sheldon Adelson,” like
says Ruth Margalit, you do not see Freedom House or any such outfit focus on
the outsize influence that the Jewish Hate And Incitement Machine (JHAIM) has
on the Anglophile rags of North America, for example.
This is why someone like Naftali Bennet in Israel can state that “Israel Hayom is Pravda –
the mouthpiece of one man [Netanyahu],” but no one in America would
dare say that Fox News is Pravda – the mouthpiece of the one and only
Netanyahu. That's because an utterance of this sort would be enough to send its
vocalizer to the Gulag of eternal oblivion.
Thus, while a columnist in Israel said that
Netanyahu's “obsession” with the news media showed him to be “gripped with fear
and paranoia,” the columnists as well as everyone else in the
politico-journalistic sphere of North America are the ones who remain gripped
with fear and terror in their own country – obsessed with what a distant
monster can order done to them if they refuse to toe his line.