Dozens of articles
are written every year by Jews who display the latest statistics concerning the
number and kind of incidents that relate to what they call antisemitism in the
world.
These days, the
authors categorize such incidents and discuss them without openly suggesting a
solution for the problem. Or if they do; it would be to suggest a new variation
on an old solution; one that was tried on previous occasions and shown to
increase incidents of antisemitism rather than diminish them.
This year is no
different, and of the dozens of articles that have already been published on
the subject, two are discussed below, having appeared on the same day, April
27, 2018, each in a different publication.
One article came
under the title: “Ironic Consequences of Europe's War Guilt” and the subtitle:
“In an attempt to atone for past wrongs, Europe
invites a resurgence of anti-Semitism,” written by Mona Charen and published in
National Review Online. She discusses antisemitism in Europe in general terms,
but more specifically in Germany
and France .
The second article came under the title: “Jeremy Corbyn's Jewish problem,”
written by Dominic Green and published in the Weekly Standard. He discusses
antisemitism in Britain .
Whereas the method
of Jewish writers in the old days was to mention the statistics and then
indicate the kind of solution they wanted to see implemented in the quest to
solve the problem of antisemitism, they choose to be a lot more subtle
nowadays. What they fail to do, however, is step outside the traditional box
containing the solutions that proved not to work. Here is how Mona Charen
walked that tightrope:
“The response among
European leaders has varied. Some avoid the question or retreat to platitudes.
Some police forces are reluctant to label attacks as 'hate crimes.' Jeremy Corbyn
is comfortable with left-wing anti-Semitism, which tends to bleed into every
other kind”.
That is in contrast
to the old days when she would have demanded that European leaders be clear and
definitive about condemning acts of antisemitism. She would also have demanded
they pass new laws that favor the Jews. And she would have demanded that the
police double and triple the effort to catch and severely punish the perpetrators
of such acts. As to the situation in Britain ,
she would have accused Jeremy Corbyn of inciting and encouraging all acts of
antisemitism happening in Britain
because he repeatedly fails to display discomfort when acts of antisemitism are
committed in his country.
And that's not all
because Charen goes on to point to a solution that is truly astounding. Here
are her words: “How can it be that only 70 years after the Holocaust, Europe 's Jews do not feel safe? It's ironic, but one
reason is guilt. Eager to live down their histories of colonialism and racism,
Europe has welcomed millions of immigrants from the Third
World .” Though she does not say it openly, Mona Charen's point is
that Europe must close the door to immigration from the Third
World so as to protect the Jews.
But the real irony
is not that Europe is taking in immigrants from where they come; it is that in
making the suggestion – however subtle it may be – Mona Charen will discourage
politicians that may have a good reason to want curbing immigration from
discussing their point of view openly lest they be accused of wanting to
implement the Jewish agenda.
As to the Dominic
Green article, here is what the author says is happening in Britain : “The
Labour Party does not have an anti-Semitism problem. It has two anti-Semitism
problems.” He goes on to list those problems as follows: Corbyn is too friendly
with Islamists as well as the Labour members and local councilors who
popularize anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. And that's not to forget the 'white
problem' which, Green says, refers to the Labour Party's inquiry about itself
in which it whitewashed the self of the anti-Semitism accusation.
Well then, what does
all that mean? Looking at the content of these two articles, and the dozens of
similar articles, we cannot help but acknowledge that scarcely 70 years after
the Holocaust during which time the Jews were pampered by humanity, the latter
has turned against the Jews. Why? Who's at fault?
You can look at
those questions anyway you want; the answer to them always boils down to this:
Either humanity is at fault and must change, or the Jews are at fault and must
change. Well, it is clear by now that the Jewish attempts to change humanity
have boomeranged. Instead of changing to embrace the ways of the Jews, humanity
has rejected those ways, and has developed resentment toward the Jews for
trying to impose them on the population.
But wait a minute.
Have the Jews not changed over the thousands of years when they roamed the
earth from one place to another? Yes they have, but the problem is that they
did not change the essence of what humanity resents about them. What they did
is blend the supremacist attitude that humanity is rejecting, with the local
culture everywhere they went, making their attitude more palatable for the
locals. Initially, the Jews scored success but the people soon discovered what
the Jews were up to and turned against them.
And that's what Mona
Charen and Dominic Green say is happening in Europe .
So the question is this: What's the solution? The answer is that the Jews must
discard the core of their system of beliefs which is that they are the chosen
children of God, and must be given exclusive privileges.