If you thought that to say the mob of Jewish pundits in
America –– working together with its counterpart in occupied Palestine
(sometimes referred to as Israel) –– is setting the foreign policy of the United
States of America, is an exaggeration or an exercise in empty talk, get ready
to see the proof that will explode your mind by the pressure of total
bewilderment.
Such proof is contained in an article that came under the
title: “Trump administration dumps another pro-Palestinian shibboleth,” written
by Thomas Lifson of the American Thinker, and printed on April 22, 2018 in his
online publication. In his article, Lifson chose to discuss a report that was
published in The Times of Israel (TOI). As it happened, however, the mob that's
running TOI was itself discussing a report that the U.S. State Department had
issued – as it does every year – in which it laid-out the state of human rights
around the world.
What happened according to TOI is that the State Department
zeroed in on something that was formulated long ago in such a way as to sound
pro-Palestinian. The Department changed the formulation to make it sound
pro-Jewish instead. And so, in an explosive expression of jubilation that's
equal only to the force of your bewilderment, Lifson joined the party his
brethren in occupied Palestine
were having.
After announcing triumphantly that the State Department “no
longer refers to the West Bank as 'occupied,'” here is how TOI and Lifson say
the event developed: “Whereas previous iterations of the Report had a section
on 'Israel and the Occupied Territories ,'
this year's document refers instead to 'Israel, Golan Heights, West Bank and Gaza .'” This being as
innocuous as it sounds; the State Department did not have to explain why it
changed the formulation. But the fact that the change did occur presented an
opportunity for the likes of TOI and Lifson to exploit it by spinning it as
follows:
“This is very significant. It is 'normalizing' Israel 's hold
on the lands it won in a war. Poland
is not about to give back to Germany
the territory that was taken at the end of World War 2. It's Gdansk ,
not Danzig … Nor is the US
about to hand over the lands it won from Mexico , as La Raza wants. War and
conquest is how pretty much every nation established itself as sovereign over
whatever territory it rules”.
To say that this is what the State Department was signaling
is of course nonsense, and anyone that reads English knows it. But if not, what
are TOI and Lifson trying to accomplish, spinning it as they did? Well, this is
a stark example of how the Jews pull tricks on America . They make the tricks so
filthy, the Americans shy away from correcting them lest they inadvertently
cause two things to happen. First, to push against the Jewish filth will tell
the world there is daylight between America
and Israel .
Second, it will encourage the growth of antisemitism in America .
To take full advantage of those fears, the Jews in America and Israel take advantage of the
situation to advance notions that become the accepted norms simply because they
were not repudiated. And the ramifications are such that they play a big role
in everyday life at home and abroad. Played in the Middle East by the Israeli
media, and played in America
by a sycophantic media, the Jewish leaders legitimize every “far out” notion
they want. The effect abroad is that the notions define America 's foreign policy from which America cannot
retract.
As to their effect at home, such notions signal to young
Americans struggling to shape a moral life for themselves that what counts in
life is getting away with what you do. If it is bad for Russia to garb Crimea but good for the Jews to
grab the West Bank ; it must be bad for
everyone to steal, murder and rape, but good for me to steal, murder and rape.
I can sin all I want, and in the same way there is a defense by temporary
insanity, there is for me a defense by temporary Jewishness.
And as usual, you can count on the Jews turning reality
upside down. This is what Lifson did when he accused the world of practicing
the double standard of allowing to others what they forbid to Israel . He went
on to say that Trump broke with that tradition, and praised him for not being
like Hitler.
But what's this guy talking about, anyway? World War Two
happened because Hitler grabbed territory from his neighbors the way that Israel is doing
now. For Lifson to say that Trump is not like Hitler because he allows Israel
to grab territory from the neighbors the way that Hitler did, proves that Trump
is not like Hitler – is a logic that has the Star of David stamped all over it.
Do you know where this argument belongs, my friend? At this
time, it belongs in the toilet. But when a new Hitler will rise, it will belong
in a much hotter place.