When a conflict erupts between two parties, it follows a
natural progression, which is to escalate the violence. If one party is by far
superior to the other, he wins the battle quickly and dictates his terms. If
the two parties are of equal strength, the conflict tends to last a long time,
even indefinitely.
In that case, one of two possibilities can happen. If the
casualties are low, the conflict will most likely last a long time before a
mediator intervenes and offers to help negotiate an end to the conflict. But if
the casualties are high, one of the combatants or both would call on a mediator
to help them negotiate an end to the conflict.
The history of the twentieth century has evolved in such a
way that the United States
of America became the de facto diplomatic
counselor the other nations called upon to help them negotiate an end to
conflicts. At first, even the Arab nations had no qualms considering America to be
the honest broker that will work to end a conflict without prejudice toward
anyone, and without prioritizing a self-serving ulterior motive.
But then, little by little, the American governing apparatus
as well as the information and entertainment institutions were infiltrated by
Jews who were and continue to be fixated on one thing only: milking everything
and everyone with whom they come into contact to serve their causes, chief
among these Israel's ambition to dominate the Middle East by eliminating every
potential rival … doing so using American power, prestige, weapons, finances,
and where necessary America's own military.
It was at this point and because of those developments that
the Arab World drafted Egypt 's
charismatic President Nasser to assume the role of protector of Arab interests
as well as counselor and mediator in charge of defusing inter-Arab conflicts,
and in charge of reconciling the belligerents.
While the new paradigm was gaining solid footing, America was losing credibility among the Arabs
and most of the Third World nations. The Arabs
expressed their displeasure at America
by instituting an oil embargo on that country; the prominent nations among
those making up the Third World , coalesced
into a Non Aligned Movement.
It is useful to keep that history in mind when reading the
article that came under the title: “Assad's Horror, and Those Who Enable It,”
and the subtitle: “Russia, Iran, and North Korea all play a role in the Syrian
regime's chemical attacks on its own people.” It was published on April 8, 2018
in The Weekly Standard.
The article was written by Thomas Joscelyn, who is a bigwig
in a comical outfit that says it is defending the so-called democracies, but is
actually the most vociferous among the most fanatic of Jewish groupings
advocating the right of converts to Judaism to possess a piece of Palestine
whatever the cost in lives lost and/or destitution to the indigenous
Palestinians that have lived on the land since the beginning of time.
And so, when someone that's not a fanatic Jew or a gullible
American is exposed to arguments such as those you'll encounter in Joscelyn's
article, he cannot help but add to the contempt that the world has for the
double standard that America
is practicing in the world today. Human beings around the globe are not only
dismayed by the policies that America
is pursuing, they are shocked that America 's so-called democracy is so
fragile it was hijacked with such ease by a handful of organized criminals in
half a century.
Look at the kind of language that Joscelyn is using to
describe the Syrian situation, and imagine an ordinary reader anywhere in the
world going over these same words. He does not read Assad as Assad or Syria as Syria . Instead, he replaces in his
mind, Assad with Netanyahu, and replaces Syria
with Israel .
The effect is that he ends up reading the following:
“The U.S.
attempted to punish Netanyahu with airstrikes –– the Zionist regime has
seemingly struck again … Details concerning this attack remain to be confirmed.
But the world has learned valuable lessons regarding the behavior of organized
criminals when it comes to their pursuit and use of lethal weapons on
civilians”.
Despite there being enough dishonesty in those few words to
revolt normal human beings, Thomas Joscelyn went on to do something that will
blow your mind.
Do you remember what he and members of his comical outfit
were saying about the U.N. because it refused to toe the Zionist line? They
made it sound like the U.N. wasn't good enough to serve as a urinal in Satan’s
Hell.
Well then, do you know how many times he invoked the U.N.'s
name in his latest article to let it be known that he agrees with the way it
has refused to toe the Assad line? He invoked it nine (9) times.
Yes, it's not only America that's practicing a double
standard, he too––Thomas Joscelyn––could not write a short article without
stuffing it with a heavy dose of hypocritical double standard.