Friday, April 12, 2019

A Superpower in the Cesspool of Victimhood

The Jews have done so much to fashion America in their own image, one place in which you you'll find that country nowadays, is the cesspool of victimhood, staying there as a permanent guest in the house of Jews.

This is not a place where you would normally look for a great power, let alone a superpower the size of America, but America is there. The astonishing thing is that many a human being have come to view America as the sole superpower in the world today and yet there it is, wallowing in the filthy habit of exposing its wounds and begging for pity, sitting as it is alongside the world's most detested pariah known as Israel.

Great powers do not play victim for many reasons, two of which are paramount. First, to be a victim is to admit that the opponent is powerful enough to hurt you. This elevates the opponent to a status at par with the superpower, which the latter will never want to admit. Second, the superpower regularly inflicts great pain on others. If it cries for hurting, it must also hear the cries of those it is hurting. And this is not a responsibility that a self-appointed policeman of the world, such as America, wants to shoulder.

So then, how did it happen that the Jews were able to drag America into the cesspool of victimhood? Well, we can attempt to answer that question by looking at a recent case. It is one in which the so-called captains of the culture pretend to be American — when in reality, their hearts reside in Israel — thus expose old American wounds for a reason that goes beyond begging for pity. They do it because their hate machine is overflowing with the desire to blanket America with incitement against someone.

These so-called captains of the culture are the editors of a Jewish publication known as the New York Post. They came up with ideas for an editorial they wrote under the title: “Ilhan Omar's outrageous writeoff of 9/11's horrors,” and had the thing printed in their publication on April 10, 2019. As can be seen in the title, the target of their hatred is Ilhan Omar, an elected member of the Federal House of representatives who refuses to pledge allegiance to Israel, preferring instead, to serve her American constituents and her country.

To make a case against Ilhan Omar, the editors reached back to a speech she had given a number of weeks earlier, in which she said — as quoted in the editorial — “the discomfort of being a second-class citizen was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something, and [Muslims] were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.” The editors reacted to those words by asking: “Some people did something?” and then exclaiming: “Wow. What a way to describe an attack that claimed 3,000 lives”.

This performance points to the gap that exists between what Omar was conveying, being the rigorously conscientious legislator that she is, and what the Jewish editors would have wanted her to convey, which would be in keeping with the half-century tradition of Jews telling American legislators how to conduct the business of the nation behind the back of the public, and in contradiction to what's good for the country.

What must be said is that unlike judges who adjudicate the specifics of each case they handle separately from all other cases, however similar they may be, lawmakers are conscious of the fact that what they do will impact multiple cases, each having its own specifics. For this reason, lawmakers train themselves mentally and emotionally to avoid getting caught in the trap of letting the specifics of one case they may have heard of in the past, color legislation that is meant to apply universally.

That is, to do their work faithfully, legislators think and operate purely in the abstract. The way to do this, is to ignore the specifics of every case they heard of, and make the laws that will address the common elements that may exist in some or all the cases. Thus, to fairly address the act that took place on September 11, 2001, and the subsequent reaction it has generated, Ilhan Omar, the consummate legislator, stripped her language of any reference pertaining to the specifics of the act, as well as to the people that committed it.

The result was this passage: “After 9/11 ... because some people did something ... we started to lose access to our civil liberties.” This is the conception of a highly disciplined mind. For this reason, Ilhan Omar should contemplate getting some training in the law so as to make herself eligible for appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States where she will shine like a bright star.

As to the Jewish editors of the New York Post, 9/11 was their opportunity, even after 18 years, to use the event for the purpose of creating as much hate for Islam as they can. They are motivated by the belief that the game of love and hate, is a zero-sum game.

That is, they believe that the more they get the public to hate the Muslims, the more the public will love the Jews. But they are so dumb, they don't realize that the bigger the ocean of hate they create for others, the more they drown in it themselves. And then they cry they are being victimized.