Let us assume, for a moment, that those who root for Israel are
correct in calling on the world to consider Israel a nation, and not just an
entity.
Let us also forget, for a moment, the ongoing crimes against
humanity in which Israel is engaged, such as the occupation of Palestine, and
the determined effort to ethnic cleanse it of its indigenous population. And
let us pretend, for a moment, not to see the constant criminal activities which
Israel frequently commits against its neighbors, such as Lebanon and Syria.
Aside from all that, the one thing we cannot forgive or forget is
an army of Jewish Fifth Columnists who reside in America and live the good
life, being highly paid with taxpayers' money — directly and indirectly — to
engage in the business of attacking the American citizens who refuse to display
allegiance to Israel.
The latter are the good American citizens, such as the Muslim
legislators, who refuse to attack those who will not distance themselves from
the people that the Jews vilify, such as Louis Farrakhan. Or they refuse to
engage in the bribing and blackmailing of elected officials, such as state
governors, in an attempt to force these people to make laws that punish the good
Americans who choose to respect the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions (BDS)
movement. Or they are American citizens who reject the accusation of being
antisemitic for not bowing to every Jewish whim. And the list is endless.
If I omitted someone or something in the list of wrongdoings with
which Israel and its backers are associated, you will get a sense of it when
you read the article that came under the title: “Rashida Tlaib Praises Her
Antisemitic Backers,” written by Steven Emerson and published on April 4, 2019
in Algemeiner. Please note that while the Fifth Columnists consider Emerson's
article perfectly legitimate, they consider this response, and everyone like
it, to be illegitimate and antisemitic.
Emerson begins his discussion by unloading on what he calls an
entourage of anti-Semites. Altogether, he mentions several activists promoting
the causes of women, as well as representatives of American NGOs, and members
of Congress — all of them women that never engaged in attacking American
citizens for refusing to display allegiance to Israel or allegiance to any
foreign country, for that matter.
In fact, these good American women never engaged in attacking
American citizens for not distancing themselves from someone. Neither did they
engage in the bribing or blackmailing of elected officials in an attempt to
force them passing laws that punish those Americans who choose to respect BDS.
And they never accused anyone of being antisemitic or anti-whatever for one
reason or another … or no reason at all.
So why is Emerson attacking these women for doing nothing worse
than engage in lawful activities, as they fulfill their civic duties, thus help
their communities be the best that they can be? The answer is that Emerson is
attacking the women because they are not diverting their energies to the
promotion of Israeli causes. And this proves that his loyalty to Israel is
infinite, whereas his loyalty to America is near zero, if it exists at all.
Here is the point of view that was made into a litmus test, and used
by the likes of Steven Emerson to determine the moral worth of an American
citizen: “The Boycott, Divest and Sanctions Movement is considered antisemitic
because it singles out the world's only Jewish state”.
Thus, when the Jews designate someone as embracing BDS or refusing
to oppose it, they single them out for character assassination and personal
destruction. They do so with a cowardly, animal-like savagery, and a relentless
campaign aimed at having these innocent people removed from the public square,
and denied remuneration for what they produce to advance civilization.
Another yardstick, that characters such as Steven Emerson use to
determine the moral worth of an American citizen, is the bias that a citizen
might display when deciding between adhering to Jewish values and adhering to
American values. They consider it a “not-so-veiled … open call for the
destruction of the Jewish state,” when someone advocates the liberation of
Palestine “from the river to the sea.” This being a convoluted method by which
the Jews express their view, an explanation is in order.
The American system of values is simple to understand. It says
that the government has no preference for any ethnic group or religion. It does
not interfere in the way that the ethnic make-up of society evolves. By
contrast, the Israeli system of values is built on the idea that Israel must be
maintained Jewish at any and all cost to the other groups.
Thus, when someone advocates majority rule on every inch of
Palestinian territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, they
advocate replacing the Zionist dream with the American system of values.