Is it possible to pull America’s democracy
out of the Jewish spiral of degeneration, thus rescue the system from an
assured annihilation, and give it a fresh chance to participate in the shaping
of a world that's being reinvented by the winds of change blowing from every
direction? The answer is yes, it can be done.
To do it, we need to understand how the
Jewish spiral of degeneration operates. We begin with the view that by and
large, human beings of every ethnicity, treat the game of life as an end in
itself, and play it for what it offers. People think of life's rewards and
punishments as the inevitable byproducts that come with being alive and so,
accept them. By contrast, the Jews view the game of life as a means to an end.
They prefer the end to be a tangible one if they can have it, or an intangible
one if that's all they can get.
Practically speaking, this means that by
hook or by crook, the Jews will want to score each time they play the game of
life. They want the world to think of them as eternal winners so as to scare
potential opponents who will choose to forfeit the game and hand a win to the
Jew rather than engage him in a fight and get beaten up. In fact, the Jews
don't care how they score: They will shoot the ball into the goalie's net if
they can, or kneecap the goalie to prevent him or her from catching the ball,
if that's the way to score.
A piece that came under the title: “Ilhan
Omar's pathetic bid to play victim after she downplayed 9/11,” written by the
editors of the New York Post and printed in their publication on April 11,
2019, shows how the Jews play the game. They wrote their latest piece in
response to the storm they had raised a day earlier with the publication of a
revolting front page editorial and photograph. In fact, along with other
pundits, I responded to that editorial in the article I titled: “A Superpower
in the Cesspool of Victimhood,” which you see printed just below the one you
are reading.
Instead of acknowledging that they got
carried away and made a mistake publishing their frontpage editorial yesterday,
the editors of the New York Post “doubled down” on their deed by continuing
their attacks on Rep. Ilhan Omar while maintaining that they did nothing wrong
the day before.
Speaking of Rep. Omar, and what they say
are “her allies,” the editors of the Post complain that we accused them of
incitement. They lodged the complaint without denying the accusation, and
without explaining why their words and photograph do not constitute incitement,
except to say that they did not threaten Omar or call for violence. But the
reality is that no one said they threatened Omar or call for violence.
What I did, is call the editors of the New
York Post a hate producing machine, busy filling an ocean with anti-Muslim
hatred; one in which they will be the ones to drown before they'll hurt someone
else. Still, the editors accused us of trying to stifle debate by declaring
that criticism of Omar was out of bounds.
But there too, the editors of the Post
were wrong. The fact is that nobody made such a declaration. In fact, I always
said that the more they attack innocent Americans for not loving Israel, the
more they give me the opportunity to show how superior to them are the
individuals they attack.
If this proves anything, it is that Jews
play the game of life by accusing others of what they see in themselves. Not
only do they have a mob of pundits ready to pounce on, and silence those that
maintain good relations with Louis Farrakhan or anyone they consider
undesirable, they demand that Ilhan Omar be politically kneecapped by kicking
her out of the Foreign Relations Committee to which she was appointed. Why is
that? Because Omar is an American legislator that refuses to pledge loyalty to
Israel.
All of that is playing the game of
politics the way that Jews define politics. But politics used to mean something
else. There was a time when politicians were considered diplomats so highly
regarded, governments relied on them to diffuse explosive situations. The
politicians could deliver on their peace-making missions because they were
trusted by all sides. They made everyone feel that their interests will be
safeguarded as long as the politician was handling the case.
But then, the Jewish influence began to
grow in America, and the definition of politics changed from being an
instrument that heals to a weapon that kills. Today, the description of a
political game can be phrased as follows: To engage in politics is to exploit
every incident, using it to make yourself look good in the eyes of the public,
or make your opponent look bad. If you wait long enough for an incident to
materialize but it doesn't, you must provoke one to force your opponent to
react, thus get the game going. When this happens, you go for the jugular and
score the win that will annihilate your opponent unless he annihilates you
first.
This is what's happening in America today
where the business of looking after the interests of the people has gotten paralyzed
because the new breed of so-called politicians forgot how to govern.
This being what the Jews brought to
America; it is what must change to save the system from being the agent of its
own annihilation.