Whether you listen to the Jews of Israel or those of America, or
you listen to any of their surrogates, the message they want the world to hear
is that all options are on the table. What they mean by all options, is that
all violent options are included, whereas all peaceful ones are excluded.
These people hold that kind of stance because they stand on a
philosophical foundation which maintains that in the same way a drop of arsenic
can be the recipe that kills a person, a small criticism of Israel or any of
the Jewish habits, can also be a recipe that will lead to the Final Solution of
all Jews. They also make the point that for this reason, the BDS movement,
which has been equated in their minds with the deadly arsenic, must be
rejected.
They push this reasoning on their audiences despite the argument
that's accepted universally, to the effect that there are only two approaches
to pushing back against someone's bad behavior. There is the peaceful approach,
and there is the violent one. If you reject the peaceful approach, you open the
door for the violent one to move in. That's because even the people who are
naturally inclined to be peaceful, can be so abused at times, they are forced to
resort to violence in a desperate effort to end the abuse.
But none of that impresses the hardcore fanatics among the Jews;
those who respond to anything that's not tacit approval of everything Jewish or
Israeli, by accusing the dissenters of antisemitism. You can see how this is
played out in the article that came under the title: “The BDS Movement Is a
Cleverly Disguised Campaign to Destroy Israel,” written by Alex Titus and
Alexander Khan, and published on April 12, 2019 in National Review Online.
The writers began the article by warning that to invoke the
principles of 'social justice' and/or 'human right' when defending someone ––
such as the Palestinians –– is to engage in a campaign of antisemitism aimed at
destroying Israel and annihilating the Jews. To prove their point, they cited
the example of the outrage that ensued “on social media and university campuses
across America when the US government denied the Palestinian Omar Barghouti
entry into the country.” Barghouti being a co-founder of the BDS movement.
What the writers mean to say, is that all those ordinary Americans
on social media and all those Americans on the university campuses, are evil
people whose sole desire is to complete the job that Hitler started by
implementing the Final Solution he died before achieving. But the two writers
seem glad that a handful of faceless bureaucrats deep inside the government of
the United States, is standing on guard for the Jews, protecting them from a
horrible fate.
But if you do not believe that Americans of the social media and
the universities are motivated by evil, you must think of them as being
foolish, say Titus and Khan. That's because: “The truth is that many of those
who support the BDS movement were duped into thinking they are supporting a
noble cause when, in fact, BDS is but a ploy established and run by
anti-Semites who seek to destroy Israel”.
To prove this theory, the two authors cite Barghouti's own words
in a passage that goes something like this:
“Barghouti referred to self-determination for Jewish settlers in
Palestine as something he opposed because colonizers are not entitled to
self-determination. A Jewish state in Palestine cannot but contravene the basic
rights of the land's indigenous Palestinians and perpetuate a system of racial
discrimination that ought to be opposed. And that's why Palestinians oppose a
Jewish state in any part of Palestine”.
Any sane person that reads these words, cannot help but question
if the Jews will next repudiate motherhood if it is shown to stand against the
idea of Jewish colonialism of the openly racist kind. And that’s not all,
because there is more where this came from. It is that the two writers went on
to explain why a handful of faceless bureaucrats, making decisions that go
against the will of the American people in the middle of the night, does not
constitute a relationship in which Jewish puppet masters are thought to be
manipulating those American bureaucrats. Here is that passage:
“Barghouti isn't afraid to play up anti-Semitic tropes. He has
portrayed the Jewish leaders as puppet masters and manipulators. He once
claimed that Jews know how to bully, how to intimidate. Congress is bought and
paid for by the Israel lobby, he said. Such talk echoes tweets to the effect
that Israel has hypnotized the world, invoking the anti-Israel crowd's favorite
boogeyman, AIPAC”.
But the two writers went on to demolish their own argument by
juxtaposing the Jewish need to work on America's bureaucrats in the dark, and
then closing their own argument with a claim that's better understood when
rephrased in the following manner:
“BDS cannot be allowed to go unchallenged given its increasing
popularity in the US. America's deep state bureaucrats support their friends,
having no greater friend and partner than the Israel lobby. Honoring that
partnership demands a firm rejection of Barghouti's motherhood causes”.