The
expression, “Self-loathing Jew” was often heard early on in America. It came
about because the rabbis had a hard time convincing the Jews that saw what
their leaders had brought onto them during the Second World War––to remain in
the fold.
In
fact, the “former” Jews would have nothing to do with Judaism under any
circumstance even if they did not convert to another religion. This is when and
why the expression, self-loathing Jew, came into vogue.
The
renegade Jews did not advertise their dislike of Judaism; they simply distanced
themselves from it and from its practices. But this behavior was enough for the
“loyal” Jews to think of them as self-hating, and so characterize them in
public. But when pushed too far by those who pretended to be righteous, the
renegades finally came up with several responses of their own.
One
such response had it that the so-called righteous Jews were themselves
self-loathing, except that they expressed the hate they had for the self by
pretending to hate those who were honest with themselves. It was as if the
pretentious were saying to the truthful: I hate you because I am you and you
are me.
From
the looks of it, that condition seems to be ingrained so deeply in the
Judeo-Yiddish culture, it continues to manifest itself in different ways to
this day, depending on the circumstances. We can see an example of that in the
article that came under the title: “America must stop helping China's regime
grow richer and more oppressive,” written by Clifford D. May, and published on
December 10, 2019 in The Washington Times.
Clifford
May is expressing his hatred for China, accusing it of everything he sees
that's wrong with America and Israel. It is as if May –– the former closet
Marxist-Leninist who now hates being on the fascist side of the fence –– sees
himself in the Chinese character as he describes it … and hating himself for
that too.
If
Clifford May is revealing anything that's new in this article, it is that he has
fused in his mind, the two characters, America and Israel, into an Amerisral
symbiotic conjugate. He sees this creature fomenting revolutions in Asia,
Africa and Latin America, and sees it projecting its military might throughout
the globe. It is living, breathing and feeding on corruption at the highest
levels of government. And of course, it is repeating the 1930s fascist policies
of expanding by annexing the land of neighbors.
Look
at what Clifford May says China is doing, which in reality applies to America
and/or Israel. Slightly tweaked to make the statements read as they should have
been written, here is what they sound like: Mistreating the Muslims. Colonizing
others. Organ harvesting of Palestinian youth. Suppressing people that struggle
to improve their lot. Stealing hundreds of billions of dollars of property that
belong to those who have little to begin with. Pursuing exploitative and
neo-imperialist policies in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Building up
military capabilities to always be superior to everyone else.
This
said, there remains the question: What's Clifford May's point, anyway? His
point is that, “China regards the United States as rival, a challenge to which
the US must respond.” As to how the US must respond, Clifford May first warns
that China is, “increasingly engaging in cyber-enabled economic warfare to
debilitate America economically in order to cripple it militarily.”
Deliberately
forgetting that it is the symbiotic conjugate Amerisrael, and not the Chinese
who constantly repeat the most cowardly sentence ever uttered in any language:
“all options are on the table,” and that it was the horrible symbiotic creature
which used cyber-enabled warfare to debilitate Iran's economy and military ––
Clifford May went on to speak morality, if you believe that someone can have
this kind of gall.
He
said that the moral thing for America to do, is to end the practice of
intertwining its economy with that of China. He added that it may or may not be
painless to do so, but it would be the right thing to do. And then, quoting
someone he agrees with, Clifford May went on to make the following point: “This
does not mean we can't do trade deals, but the deals should be bilateral”.
Do
you know what this means, my friend? It means that Clifford May wants
Amerisrael to adopt the economic version of the colonialist dictum: Divide and
rule. When he says the deals should be bilateral, he means they should not be
multilateral. The reason why these people want to avoid multilateral deals is that
such deals protect the big and small economies equally.
But
the Jews prefer to negotiate with someone that's so defenseless and standing
alone, they would agree to any deal that's imposed on them. And so, having
called the Chinese neocolonialists, Clifford May now tells America how to
practice economic colonialism, which is the new form of colonialism, better
known as neocolonialism.
Does
Clifford May really hate the Chinese for that? Or does he hate himself, seeing
his own image reflected in the way that he describes the Chinese? Only he knows
the answer.