The moment that an agreement is formulated
between two people or more, a social contract comes into existence. Depending
on the nature of the contract and the size of the community that adheres to its
terms, you'll have a code of conduct for a company, a bylaw for a municipality,
a statute for an autonomous jurisdiction or a constitution for a sovereign
country.
The one thing that all the groupings must
have to render the social contract legitimate, is an independent body that sits
in judgment and if need be, order that the articles of the social contract be
enforced when disputes arise between the members that come under its
jurisdiction. When this happens, the articles come to be viewed as the law of
the land.
The significance of this development is
that the law of the land, as administered by an independent body of judges, is
meant to replace the edicts which are proclaimed by a single individual known
as king or dictator, who may or may not be assisted by a small coterie of
sycophants. When a sovereign country is overseen by those who make the laws and
those who enforce them, it is considered to adhere to the system of liberal
democracy. It is called a nation of laws as opposed to a nation governed by the
cult of personality.
Authentic democracy has been the pride of
the American system of governance and the triumph of its constitution for two
centuries. And then, America was infested by the Judeo-Yiddish disease which
began to decompose it from the inside. The result has been that today, you have
an American president that can send troops anywhere in the world on a whim,
bomb a country to show contempt for his predecessor and withhold aid to a
foreign ally for the quid pro quo of improving his election chances by trashing
his opponent.
As to the congress, it has become a
two-chamber veritable whorehouse of male and female prostitutes who would sell
the honor of the country, not only to the highest foreign bidder but also the
most ruthless of blackmailers. Even if a member that's running for congress has
done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide, he or she can still be terrorized
by the Jewish organizations that have complete control over the media in
America. The candidates running for congress fear being targeted for not
“loving” Israel enough by the lewdest of prostitutes who would give away their
mothers and daughters to a Jewish brothel for a Netanyahu smile, a pat on the
back and a stroking of the buttocks.
The way that the Jews brought about that
level of filth into the American system, is that they took advantage of a
practice known as politics. This used to be a vehicle that allowed difficult
issues to be resolved by giving each side in a dispute a way to compromise
their position, yet claim victory for getting something that would otherwise
have been unattainable.
The Jews looked at politics and saw, not a
vehicle of convenience to move them from position A to position B, but a
wormhole that could lead them to an entirely new universe. They worked on it,
reshaped it and turned it into a network of passages that lead them to
anywhere, anytime without anyone sensing what they are doing. You can see an
example of that when you go over the article that came under the title: “Political
Games at the Hague,” written by Gerald Steinberg, and published on December 26,
2019 in the Jewish publication Algemeiner.
So far, the Jewish effort to control
events on the international stage, has met with failures. That's because the
Jews tried to apply to the world, the formula they used in America with great
success. Whereas they could politicize and subjugate just about everything they
touched in America, they failed to politicize the world institutions, much less
subjugate them.
Still, you see Gerald Steinberg try to
accomplish the impossible in his article. Look how he started his conversation:
“The ICC was created in the context of the negotiations that ended in 1998 with
the Rome Statute. The facade may be legal, but in practice, this is a political
institution.” He believes that by calling the ICC a political institution,
other writers will do likewise, and before you know it, everybody will come to
think of the ICC as a political institution. That's when the Jews hope to play
the game they have been perfecting for centuries, and score the successes that
have eluded them to this day.
For now, however, Steinberg is longing for
the implementation on the international stage, of the blackmail that has worked
well for the Jews in America. Here is how he expressed that sentiment: “The
question is whether countries like Holland, Norway and Denmark will tell the
court that its survival depends on ending this anti-Israel hunt”.
Because the Jews alone could not scare
those sovereign countries, they will depend on the Americans doing the criminal
act of blackmailing sovereign countries to please the only terrorist entity on
the planet today. Will America do it? To be honest, nothing can be ruled out
when it comes to the possible response of those who would give away their
mothers and daughters to a Jewish brothel.
Meanwhile, Steinberg did another thing
that is vintage Jewish. He slandered everyone he thought might be connected
with the failure of Jews to take control of the important world institutions. He
attacked people such as Kenneth Roth, Omar Shakir, Richard Goldstone and Fatou
Bensouda. He attacked institutions such as Human Rights Watch, PLO, PFLP, Al
Haq, Al-dameer, PCHR, Al Mezan and the UN Human Rights Council. And he attacked
countries like Switzerland, Holland, Sweden, Denmark, the UK, Belgium, Germany
as well as the European Union.