Thursday, August 27, 2020

Here is how the fantasy became an obsession

The fact that the Jewish mantra has been, “next year in Jerusalem” for as long as anyone alive today can remember –– says that the Jews were having deeply rooted fantasies about the Middle East; so deep in fact, they bordered on the obsession.

Now that the first leg of their fantasy has been realized with their occupation of Palestine, including Jerusalem, it stands to reason that their fantasy has not ended. What is adding credence to that view are the activities and rhetoric in which both Israel and the Jews engage every day.

In fact, a recent article has appeared which demonstrates not only that the fantasy is still a factor in Jewish thinking, but that it has morphed to become a brand-new obsession. The title of the article is: “Lebanon may be broken beyond repair,” which also came under the subtitle: “Its debt is massive, its political class corrupt, and terrorists call the shots.” It was written by Clifford D. May and published on August 25, 2020 in The Washington Times.

Indicative of Clifford May's state of mind regarding the massive explosion that recently hit the port at Beirut, Lebanon, is the opinion he expressed concerning the event. The occasion was the visit to Lebanon of the French President Emmanuel Macron who reassured the people of Lebanon that he was there to help them. As if on the couch of a psychiatrist doing word association, the first thing that came to Clifford May's mind was to utter these words: “It's doubtful he'll succeed”.

This says that Clifford May was doing more than just expressing a harmless opinion. It says that he obsesses about Lebanon breaking up so badly, it will be beyond repair at long last. That's what May wishes will happen because when a country is in such condition, it becomes an easy prey for a predator to catch if that's what Israel wants to do, or become a low-hanging fruit for a lazy opportunist to grab if that's what Israel has become, given that it has been deterred by Hezbollah, which is what the evidence suggests.

At a time when street protests are erupting on a nightly basis in America and Israel, which are Clifford May's countries of the head and the heart respectively, he speaks of street protests in Lebanon as if they were a strange apparition, heretofore unknown to Planet Earth and having the effect of, “shattering Lebanon politically and economically”.

Thus, when done with the preamble, Clifford May got into what he wanted to say next. It is that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, it is affiliated with Iran, it is practically governing Lebanon and running that country into the ground. Hezbollah is also equipped with deadly weapons that can seriously damage Israel, he went on to say. For this reason, he wants the world to do something to get rid of it.

For his part, Clifford May used innuendo to make it sound like Hezbollah was responsible for the massive Beirut explosion, now that it has been established that the explosion was an accident. Here is how he formulated the innuendo: “Welders accidentally ignited materials that detonated ammonium nitrate stored in the port where Hezbollah has free reign. Ammonium nitrate is useful for agriculture and terrorist bomb-making.” Not very persuasive, of course, but it’s a try.

Not only did Clifford May express such opinion, he had his comical Foundation for Defense of Democracies commission an economist he characterized as “eminent,” and had him write a report that gave Clifford May and the Jews of his ilk, the kind of conclusion that sounded like music to their ears. It is that the eminent economist has concluded the following: “Lebanon today is broke. The entire country has been picked clean by terrorists, criminals, elites and the political class,” Clifford May so assures his readers.

To put that view in perspective, he cited the case of Argentina that was bailed out by the IMF two years ago. But when you try to determine why the same will not work for Lebanon, you find that Clifford May has made no connection and no case of any kind. In fact, his words leave you with the impression that Lebanon can be bailed out, and most certainly will be. But to hedge his bet that Lebanon cannot be bailed out, May has added this: “Even if donors were to provide sufficient funds, it's not clear how the money could be utilized”.

However, as far as Clifford May is concerned, all of that is nothing more than a sideshow. His real concern has always been the safety of Israel, and the big threat that's facing it now is Hezbollah. This is why Clifford May ended his article with the following lamentation:

“Mr. Macron has said not a word about disarming or defanging Hezbollah. He doesn't seem to grasp that investing billions of dollars to save the country [Lebanon] would be a fool's errand”.

In other words, Clifford May is asking the world to let Lebanon struggle all by itself so that in the end, Israel will have an easy time hunting it like a wounded prey, or if it prefers, stretch its arm up and grab the low hanging-fruit.

Their fantasy never ends even after it has been realized.