Here we go again; in the same
breath that the Jews inform the world there can never be a resolution to the
situation in occupied Palestine, they also scream “don't touch anything” or
you'll kill the possibility of forging and implementing a resolution to the
situation in occupied Palestine.
Yet again, Bret Stephens has
resorted to the use of that confusing trick to make the point that the only
resolution to the unresolvable situation in the Middle East, is for the
Palestinians to voluntary surrender in full, and consider themselves aliens
ineligible to any part of Palestine, while publicly declaring that the land is
now, has been in the past, and will always be a property of the Jews.
If you go by the gist of the
Stephens article, the Palestinians should then make arrangements for their
orderly departure from the land of Palestine while urging the wealthy Arab
states to pay the Jews compensation for their having squatted on Jewish land
since before there were Jews to own the land.
The Bret Stephens article came
under the title: “The Siren Song of 'One State,'” and the subtitle: “A hopeless
plan could dash hopes for a peaceful resolution between Israelis and
Palestinians.” It was published on August 3, 2020 In The New York Times.
The central idea powering the
article's arguments, is that there is only one Jewish state in the world and
that it should remain Jewish given that each of the other religions is hosted
by several states. Well, the trouble with this idea is that to maintain Israel
as a Jewish state, the Palestinians who own the place and have owned it since
the beginning of time, will have to be stripped of everything they own,
including their identity. And all that’s taken from them, will be handed over
to aliens from around the world whose affinity for Palestine is similar to that
of a sea horse's affinity for a horseracing track in the desert. It comes to
zero.
As to the claim that without
Israel, the Jews will be the only religion that has no territory of its own ––
is a bogus claim. The fact is that there is a dozen or more religions that fit
this category. In addition, if they were to make a territorial claim––which
they are not––these religions would have an advantage over the Jews in that
they can prove they are of the region where they have lived since time
immemorial. Here are a few of such religions: Taoism,
Shinto, Falun Gong, Shamanism, Caodaism, Tenriism and Jainism.
The subject that's tackled by
Bret Stephens this time, is the one-state solution. But the reality is that
whenever the occupation of Palestine is tackled, the same old distortions,
outright lies and fantasies are brought out by the pundits advancing the
Judeo-Israeli cause. This time is no exception, which is why you see a passage
like the following:
“It's important to point out
the damages [such] proposal creates. The first is the damage to the hopes of a
peaceful two-state settlement. Israelis have been amenable to territorial
concessions when they felt confident that Americans believed in the moral
necessity of a Jewish state. It's why George W. Bush achieved more in terms of
territorial withdrawals by hugging Israel close than trying to maintain
daylight between Washington and [occupied] Jerusalem”.
So, there you have it. Bret
Stephens says that people should stop talking about a one-state solution
because it gets in the way of talking about a two-state solution. But talking
about a two-state solution has been ongoing for half a century and has yielded nothing.
In fact, we know now that it will continue to yield nothing because the Jews
have finally so admitted.
In fact, for half a century,
the Jews have pretended to negotiate proposals for a two-state solution only to
torpedo the deal moments before signing. But now that they know they can brag
about their prowess in deceiving the world when it comes to revealing their
true intentions, the Jews fearlessly come out and say in-your-face: What
solution? There is no such a thing as a solution because there has never been a
Palestinian state, there isn't one now, and there will never be one.
As if this were not enough,
Bret Stephens went on to do a little deceiving of his own. He says that the
Israelis made territorial concessions under George W. Bush because he hugged
them and allowed no daylight between America and Israel. This is a monumental
lie. In fact, the opposite is true. The Jews conned Bush into signing a piece
of paper by which he is supposed to have given Israel what does not belong to
him.
As to Israel withdrawing from
territory to make concessions for peace, this is a lie that's even more massive
than monumental. The truth is that Israel never stopped grabbing more
Palestinian lands from which it did not voluntarily relinquish as much as a single
square inch. The only Palestinian land it used to occupy but no more, is Gaza.
The reason why Israeli troops and settlers are no longer there, is because the
people of Gaza kicked them out.
The Jews are also out of the
Sinai, South Lebanon and Eastern Golan because they were soundly defeated and
booted out of there like a band of home-invading thugs.