Saturday, August 22, 2020

The more they accuse others, the more they tell who they are

Theirs is a culture based on the twin symbols of evil: savagery and cowardice. They'll go behind your back, meet those that can hurt you, tell them fabricated stories about you, and incite them to come after you because if they don't, you'll be the one to go after them.

But if that will not work because you're not a simple individual minding your business, but are a public figure enjoying an honorable position in the public domain, they'll come after you relentlessly and publicly, trying to sow doubt about your character in the eyes of the public.

This is the culture of the Jews … and that kind of behavior is the staple on which they feed as they fantasize about the day when the messiah will come and hand them the ownership keys of Planet Earth and everything it contains, including the billions of men, women and children that make up the human race.

Whereas this sort of behavior permeates everything that the Jews do, playing out in a variety of versions day in and day out, you can see how it is playing in a case that is currently unfolding. It involves Jordan Davidson the Jewess who plunged into the sewer of Jewish filth, grabbed what she could at the bottom of the tank and threw it, not at Louis Farrakhan or Ilhan Omar who are the usual targets, but at Linda Sarsour this time.

You'll see what Davidson has tried to do when you read the article she wrote under the title: “Linda Sarsour, Who Raised Funds For Terrorist, Featured As DNC 2020 Speaker,” a dishonest piece of work that was published on August 18, 2020 in The Federalist. It must be said that accusing others of terrorism or associating with terrorists, is not something new but something that follows a long-established pattern. 

You see, my friend, every time that the Jews felt they bored their audiences with baseless accusations they threw at others, they looked at themselves in the mirror to see what else the good people of the world might be seeing in them. When they discover something horrible about themselves, they accuse the others of that very thing.

This time, it happened that when Israel came up with a plan to ethnic cleanse Palestine of its Palestinian population, the Jews discovered that the world was seeing the true face of terrorism in Israel. This is why foot soldiers of the crime syndicate that is Israel, such as Jordan Davidson, began to throw the accusation of terrorism at everyone they dislike.

It is not surprising, therefore, that Jordan Davidson has accused Linda Sarsour of raising funds for “Terrorist,” a passage that was so baseless and outrageous, even the editor of The Federalist was so horrified to see it there, he/she took it out. The problem is that they forgot to take it out the article's title where the accusation remained and went into print. What an embarrassment for The Federalist.

Aside from all that stinky stuff, look what little things the Jews grab onto as they try to generate the sense of a big deal when they discover they have no legs to stand on, but wish to stand on something, anything at all that will make them look taller than they really are:

“In 2019 Sarsour came under fire for claiming that Israel was built on the idea that Jews are supreme to everyone else. According to The Times of Israel, Sarsour also supports a boycott of Israel and favors a one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The one-state solution is code for ending the state of Israel”.

Typical of the way by which the Jews avoid having an honest debate, Jordan Davidson said that Linda Sarsour came under fire from someone she did not name. But why did Sarsour come under fire? She did, says Davidson, because of what Sarsour had said. Well then, what was it that merited a fiery response from a faceless individual? It was that Israel was built on the idea that Jews are supreme to everyone else. If so, why did Jordan Davidson not respond to Linda Sarsour instead of saying what someone else had said about the matter? Well, there is only one answer to this crucial question. It is that Jews do not get into honest debates, and Jordan Davidson is Jewish. Period.

Proceeding in the same vein, Jordan Davidson quoted –– not Linda Sarsour directly or some American publication, but –– The Times of Israel which itself had quoted Sarsour as saying she supports BDS, and favors the one-state solution to the Palestinian issue. Only then did Jordan Davidson venture to comment that the one-state solution will end the state of Israel.

Of course, that's an improvement over saying what someone else has said, but it is not enough to say that the one-state solution will end the state of Israel without explaining what the word “end” means in this context. Ending apartheid in Rhodesia and South Africa ended the apartheid states, and this turned out to be the best thing that happened to the two countries. It will also be a good thing happening to occupied Palestine.

But if Jordan Davidson does not like this idea, she can tell her collaborators in Israel to get on with the two-state solution.