Clifford D. May is lamenting:
“America's key European Allies side with Tehran, Moscow and Beijing,” which is
the title of his latest column actually. It was published on August 18, 2020 in
The Washington Times.
The amazing thing about this
column is that the author is proceeding under the self-delusional impression
that he is doing a good job explaining to his readers why it is unfair for the
Europeans to part company with America at this time, when in reality he is
doing a good job explaining to his readers why it is perfectly logical for the
Europeans to part company with America at this time.
The problem that's diminishing
Clifford May's ability to reason logically, is that the twisted Jewish culture
in which he was raised, continues to influence his thinking to a high degree
despite the many years during which he was exposed to different cultures and
different modes of thinking. Regrettably, he fails to see what the world ––
including America's allies –– sees, which is that America and not Iran is the
world's leading sponsor of terrorism. It is so by virtues of being Israel's
funder and provider of weapons at a time when Israel is known to be the only
terrorist entity in the world today.
Had the American people not
been swamped by tsunami waves of Jewish propaganda for more than half a
century, they would have rejected what their politicians are doing, shredding
every American principle as they do, to serve Israel's interests while antagonizing
the world, including America's allies. But the good news is that after half a
century of silence, the American people are beginning to make their views
knows. They are speaking up to the effect that the lowlife politicians must
sacrifice no more of their country for any reason, especially not for the
treasonous expectation that the Jews can or will help them get reelected.
And so, while the American
people are endeavoring to pull their country away from the Jewish orbit, and
get it closer to where the rest of the world stands, the Jews who pretend to be
Americans while being loyal to Israel and only Israel, continue to try steering
America away from the rest of the world. Their aim is to get America back into
the Jewish orbit so that it will remain beholden to serving Israel's interests
as it had been doing for half a century.
This time, Clifford May is not
saying anything about the shift in attitude among the American people who
decided to side with the world rather than the Jews. But he is saying something
about America's closest allies who stood with the world by abstaining to vote
on an anti-Iran resolution that was introduced in the Security Council of the
UN by America. This is what Clifford May has said about the allies:
“The leaders of Britain and
France along with Germany, Belgium and Estonia abstained … as I fear, because
they have adopted a policy of accommodation and appeasement vis-a-vis
threatening regimes. Keep in mind that Iran's rulers and Hezbollah, have been
responsible for multiple acts of terrorism on European soil”.
What does that say to you, my
friend? Does it not blow every paradigm under which the Jews have been telling
America to operate? They were saying that maximum pressure on Iran was going to
make that country capitulate. Instead, Clifford May is now saying that the
West, including the American public, have capitulated in the face of Iran's
ability to inflict pain on those that harm its interests.
And what is there to say about
the progressive American people breaking away with their politicians on the
subject of slavish allegiance to the Jews and to Israel? Is Clifford May
accusing these people of cowering in the face of terrorism the way that he
accuses the Europeans?
Whether there is truth in
Clifford May's new muddled ideas or there isn't, such ideas lead to the paradox
of the man simultaneously asserting two opposite situations. (1) The policy of
maximum pressure on Iran, which he and his colleagues have advocated for years,
turned out to be a dismal failure according to him. (2) America must continue
that same policy and expect a different result.
Some people may see insanity
in that kind of attitude, and dismiss the whole thing as just another worthless
Jewish exercise. But other people, especially those in Europe, assign a high
value to this kind of talk when it comes out of America. That's because time
after time, the Europeans saw that a media campaign highlighting Jewish desires
for something, often translated into “kinetic” action inflicted by the American
military on someone, somewhere in the world.