What is reverse free speech?
Reverse free speech is a highly developed method by which you can use your
right to free speech as guaranteed by the United States Constitution, to
prevent someone else from exercising their right to free speech as guaranteed
by that same Constitution.
How does that subvert the US
Constitution? First, let's understand that there are many ways by which the
word “subvert” is defined, one of which being the stealthy and cowardly manner
by which to overthrow an existing order. In this case, the order that's
overthrown is the right of everyone to exercise their free speech when agreeing
or when disagreeing with others, without attempting to silence them. Failing to
do so would subvert the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The self-appointed leaders who
pretend to speak for all Jewish Americans are the group that developed the
stealthy and cowardly method by which to use their right to free speech to
subvert the same right that's guaranteed to everyone, without exception, by the
First Amendment of the US Constitution.
You can see how those Jews go
about implementing their demonic scheme when you read the article that came under
the title: “Associated Press profile on Al Sharpton forgets to mention the
times he incited anti-Semitic riots,” written by Becket Adams and published on
August 27, 2020 in The Washington Examiner.
What makes this piece an
iconic case study, is that the Associated Press’s discussion of Al Sharpton,
which displeased Becket Adams of the Washington Examiner, was done by –– not a
booster of Sharpton, or done in the context of a campaign to elevate him to a
higher position but –– a publication that was doing a routine kind of work such
as exposing, in a balanced way, the reality of what Al Sharpton represents to
the people who need him, listen to him and follow him.
And so, instead of following a
pattern that would have satisfied the requirement of the Constitution, such as
engaging the Associated Press and/or Al Sharpton himself, in an open debate
that would have parsed all the relevant issues and clarified their components,
Becket Adams did the very Jewish thing of dragging out, ruminating and
regurgitating the long accumulated list that was compiled by the stealthy and
cowardly self-appointed leaders of the Jews. That's a list of what they say
should prove that Al Sharpton is a bad guy, that he must only be portrayed as
an evil character, and never characterized in glowing terms.
Okay, you say to yourself,
you'll keep an open mind about this. But Becket Adams of the Washington
Examiner better show convincingly that Al Sharpton is an evil character, or the
false accusations they are making up will force you to consider the Jews
themselves to be the evil characters.
So, you go through the
article, and what do you find? You find not a single moment when Al Sharpton
said or did something that even the Jews would consider impeachable. Every
incident that Adams has cited, involved Sharpton being with people that the
system had failed, comforting them and lending them support. But as it happens
in such gatherings, there were moments when someone used language that Mother
Theresa would not approve of. And so, Becket Adams falsely and knowingly
attributed such indiscretions to Al Sharpton, as if he were the one that
uttered the inappropriate words.
And in the same way that the
cowardly self-appointed leaders of the Jews have tried to indict and crucify
impeccable men and women of the Louis Farrakhan, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and
Linda Sarsour caliber, Becket Adams and the Washington Examiner –– who
fanatically champion the war criminals of Israel –– are trying to indict and
crucify Al Sharpton for helping his people overcome the injustices of a system
that keeps failing them in every way you can think of.
Their demonic effort boils
down to applying maximum pressure on Al Sharpton in the hope that he'll praise
Israel and the Jews while trashing his own people. Well, there is only one
thing to say about Becket Adams and the Washington Examiner, and say it to
their faces. It is this: Someone better advise these characters when it'll be
that hell will freeze over.
Until this happens,
publications like the Washington Examiner will pay people like Becket Adams not
to openly engage in debates with those who are spiritually, morally and
ethically superior to them. Instead, they'll pay the Adams of this world to
collect what they call historical events about the good people. In reality,
these would be events that project an image to the world that's no more
significant than a tired Joe dozing off while watching a boring television
show. And yet, the Adams and the Examiners of America will describe such events
as earth shattering, destined to go down in history like say, the Fall of the
Roman Empire.