There can only be one truth about the occurrence of one and the same event. There can never be a scintilla of truth about the repeated occurrence of one and the same opinion.
What this means is that if one
or more witnesses describe the same event differently, then it can be said that
at best, only one of the witnesses is telling the truth and everyone else is
lying. That's because an event can occur in only one version –– there can never
be alternative truths.
As to the opinion, if one or
more pundits express the same opinion the same way, then it can be said that at
best, only one of the pundits is the author of the opinion. That's because an
opinion can never occur to a multitude in one and the same version. Therefore,
it must be that one pundit has created the opinion whereas the others are
parroting the creative author.
It is crucial to remember
those maxims because we live in an age where the culture has been shocked by
communication waves it has not yet absorbed, let alone demarcated into what is
opinion and what is fact. We can see how this is playing out in the propaganda
war that the Jewish distortion machine has unleashed on the American public and
the governing elites inside the Washington Beltway and in State Capitals.
A good example to study would
be the article that came under the title: “Expectations regarding US
re-implementing Iran nuclear deal should be tempered,” and the subtitle:
“Knowing what's at stake, Western governments cannot return to status quo ante
with Iran.” The article was written by Tom Ridge –– who was America's first
Homeland Security secretary and governor of Pennsylvania –– and was published
on December 16, 2020 in The Washington Times.
What is notable about Tom
Ridge's article is that it uses a new trick to parrot an opinion that was put
out long ago by the Jewish propaganda machine, and has been in circulation ever
since. Ridge seems to argue that the opinion may be old, but its renewal is
based on new facts, which makes it his own. Here is how he presented his case:
“The European parties to the
Iran Nuclear Deal are hoping that Joe Biden will return to the deal upon
assuming office. They should temper their expectations. Re-implementing the
deal would be a tall order even if the status quo remains unchanged in other
areas of Iran policy. Iran's rulers have injected complications into the
process by their belligerent stance. That posture became visible in June 2018,
when Tehran attempted to carry out a terrorist attack in France. The terror
plot began to take shape after a nationwide uprising in January 2018, revealing
that the regime is in a vulnerable position. The perpetrators of the June 2018
terror plot went on trial in Belgium over the past several weeks”.
Thus, Tom Ridge says that the
attempted terror which took place more than two years ago in France, attesting
to the vulnerability of the Iranian regime, has gone to trial in Belgium a few
weeks ago, and this is proof that what was said then about the vulnerability of
the Iranian regime is valid today. And this is why it sounds like he is
parroting the Jewish propaganda machine of yesteryear when in reality he is
not. But what's the utility in doing so, anyway? It is to caution Joe Biden not
to return to the Iran nuclear deal, and to ask the Europeans, who don't believe
in anything peddled by the Jewish propaganda machine, to nevertheless temper
their expectations.
But the truth is that the 2015
Iran nuclear deal was opposed by the mob of Jewish pundits, the neocons the
warmongers and every Israeli diplomat that addressed the subject, even while it
was negotiated. And it has been rejected by them after it was signed. Its
abrogation by Donald Trump was cheered, and its expected re-implementation by
the upcoming Biden administration, has been dreaded by the usual suspects.
Having claimed ownership of
the opinion that was created long before he thought of it, Tom Ridge proceeded
to build on it. Having learned from the Jews how to play the game, his first
order of business was to scare the public, which he did as follows: “Had the
[terror] operation been carried out [which it never was,] the casualties would
have been significant.” Next was to attribute the horror that did not happen to
his primary target: the Iranian regime and Western complacency.
Thus, even though nothing
happened, Tom Ridge spoke as if something did, and he connected that
nothing-something to the cause he is articulating. It was the necessity to
continue abrogating the Iran nuclear deal by the incoming Biden administration.
This is how he put it: “The 2015 nuclear deal reflects a longstanding Western
tendency toward conciliation or even appeasement”.
Finally, like the cry of a
dying cause, the last wish of the pleadings delivered by Tom Ridge, sounded
like the relentlessly repeated AIPAC list of demands. It went like this:
“Western governments can place Tehran in a position that it will make
concessions on terrorism, missile development, interventionism and human
rights. Tehran is in no position to make the calls. The US and Europe
collectively are”.
It seems that Tom Ridge forgot this has been the bark that got no one's attention, least of all the Europeans who got so tired of Jewish America's incessant barks, they decided to block the sound whenever someone like Tom Ridge let it out.