When there exists an order of things that has not been altered by human hands, it is said to be natural. When the order is a fauna or flora that changes because it goes through a cycle of life that's proper to it, we see in the transformation, a process we call organic. Whatever the final setup of an existing order, and whichever we way we look at it, we call it a paradigm. Considering the organic evolution of this setup, we think of it as an organic paradigm.
Can there be a setup that is
designed by human hands, and be considered an artificial paradigm without
thinking of those terms as forming an oxymoron? The answer is “probably,” but
only as long as the component parts are designed by human hands, whereas the
final assembly comes together naturally. But if humans act to influence the
final assembly, the resulting construct becomes an illegitimate make-believe
artificial paradigm.
Humans are the end product of
a natural, organic paradigm that has been in the making for billions of years.
It is only during the last moments of this process that we came along, and made
it so that we can now do more than alter the natural order to ensure our
continued survival within it. What we do is create a so-called artificial
paradigm and impose it on nature's organic paradigm.
We see this reality in
everything that we do in science and technology which allows us to impose our
will on nature. The pros and cons of this outcome will be with us to debate for
as long as we exist. But there is something else that we do not easily
perceive. It is that some people mimic the making of an organic paradigm by
fabricating component parts well ahead of time. They add them to the assembly,
one piece at a time, whenever possible without being detected. The final
product begins to look, not like a smooth picture, but a mosaic that's made of
separate parts. Eventually, the whole assembly serves the purpose of its
makers, something that can only happen at the expense of everything and
everyone else.
The people who do that, do it
for the higher purpose of protecting their tribe from what they believe is an
existential threat. They are the Jews that have been busy for half a century,
producing the component parts for a design they believe was handed to them by
God. It orders them to take over the superpower that is America, and go from
there to conquer the world. And so, they started to work on a new paradigm that
will offer them the right climate during which they believe that America will
let itself be taken over by them.
You can see how that paradigm
is shaping when you read the article that came under the title: “Why America
Needs a Foreign Policy Reset,” and the subtitle which reads in part as follows:
“World affairs are rarely black and white. Alliances should serve as
instruments of US policy rather than ends in themselves. History as we knew it
has returned.” It was written by Dimitri K. Simes, and published on December
20, 2020 in The National Interest. Here is the pertinent passage, reproduced in
condensed form:
“What passes for policy
analysis today, I feel like I've been whisked back to Brezhnev's Soviet Union,
where one had to use obligatory terms and demonstrate devotion to political
orthodoxy to be taken seriously. Terms like 'democracy,' 'liberal international
order,' 'alliances,' 'aggression,' and 'disinformation' are deployed not as
analytical tools that help interpret the world but as buzzwords intended to
show that whoever is using them is playing by the rules. This lack of
analytical rigor is evident in dialogue on NATO”.
This shows the kind of
groupthink that has allowed the Jews to turn the term “bipartisan” into a code
word that means, “To serve the interests of Jews and Israel only.” There was a
time when the term was used as an expression of pride by politicians who wanted
to say they accomplished something despite their differences. Now, this is
never heard when the business is America’s. Instead, the term is used by the
Jews to brag about the control they exercise on America's governing elites, and
have them serve Israel while neglecting the business of America.
One of the issues that the
Jews have been adamant about, is getting America to stay involved in a state of
perpetual war. It has cost America a tremendous amount already in terms dead
soldiers, wasted wealth and standing in a world that does not appreciate
America’s stance on this matter.
You can feel the agony
expressed by non-Jewish America when you read the article that came under the
title: “We owe Americans an end to perpetual wars,” written by Rep. Chip Roy
& Jason Pye, and published on December 21, 2020 in The Washington Examiner.
The following is the most pertinent passage concerning that issue:
“The fiscal cost is
astounding. According to the Watson Institute of International and Public
Affairs, the post-Sept. 11 approach to foreign policy has cost nearly $2
trillion. Added to that are the $437 billion for medical and disability care
for veterans who have served in these wars. Including interest costs and
anti-terrorism spending, the cost of post-Sept. 11 wars now exceeds $6.4
trillion”.
The more that the Jews manage
to add parts to their mosaic, the more they feel proud of what they have
accomplished, and the more they brag about it.
But something else happens as
well. It is that the more they come close to completing the picture, the more
that ordinary people see the horror that awaits America, and the more they want
to end the Jewish experiment.
This is what happened to the Jews everywhere they went, and is happening in America now. These people never learn from their mistakes.